Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 3/3] rcu: Update RCU maintainership

[Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>]

On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 03:42:04PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> 
> Drop Dipankar Sarma at his request (https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/6/2/628),
> add Josh Triplett based on long-term review, contributions, and
> agreement to take on this role (https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/6/2/554).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>

Does it make sense to keep separate entries for each of these, at this
point, or should we just merge all of them into the main "READ-COPY
UPDATE (RCU)" entry?

>  MAINTAINERS | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index 92f2bf91eec1..922661d17083 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -7405,6 +7405,7 @@ F:	kernel/rcu/torture.c
>  
>  RCUTORTURE TEST FRAMEWORK
>  M:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> +M:	Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
>  R:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
>  R:	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
>  R:	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
> @@ -7430,8 +7431,8 @@ S:	Supported
>  F:	net/rds/
>  
>  READ-COPY UPDATE (RCU)
> -M:	Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>
>  M:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> +M:	Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
>  R:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
>  R:	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
>  R:	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
> @@ -8214,6 +8215,7 @@ F:	mm/sl?b.c
>  SLEEPABLE READ-COPY UPDATE (SRCU)
>  M:	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
>  M:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> +M:	Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
>  R:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
>  R:	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
>  L:	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> -- 
> 1.8.1.5
>