public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
Cc: konrad@kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
	boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] xen: Introduce 'xen_nopv' to disable PV extensions for HVM guests.
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2014 09:55:19 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140709135519.GB21837@laptop.dumpdata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53BD311B.2050404@citrix.com>

On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 01:10:03PM +0100, David Vrabel wrote:
> On 08/07/14 21:52, konrad@kernel.org wrote:
> > From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
> > 
> > By default when CONFIG_XEN and CONFIG_XEN_PVHVM kernels are
> > run, they will enable the PV extensions (drivers, interrupts, timers,
> > etc) - which is perfect.
> 
> If it's "perfect" what's this option for? ;)

:-)
> 
> I think you mean to say "which is the best option for the majority of
> use cases".

Yes!
> 
> > However, in some cases (kexec not fully wokring, benchmarking)
> > we want to disable Xen PV extensions. As such introduce the
> > 'xen_nopv' parameter that will do it.
> 
> "working"
> 
> I'm unconvinced about the utility of this option.  The resulting kernel
> will go like molasses and I'm not sure what the use of being any to
> benchmark a configuration no one will use in practice.  But it's a small
> patch so
> 
> Reviewed-by: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>

Thank you.

> 
> David
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

      reply	other threads:[~2014-07-09 13:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-07-08 20:52 [PATCH v2] xen: Introduce 'xen_nopv' to disable PV extensions for HVM guests konrad
2014-07-09 12:10 ` [Xen-devel] " David Vrabel
2014-07-09 13:55   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140709135519.GB21837@laptop.dumpdata.com \
    --to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
    --cc=konrad@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox