From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux@arm.linux.org.uk, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Morten.Rasmussen@arm.com,
efault@gmx.de, nicolas.pitre@linaro.org,
linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, daniel.lezcano@linaro.org,
dietmar.eggemann@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/12] sched: test the cpu's capacity in wake affine
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 13:06:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140710110644.GX3935@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1404144343-18720-8-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 06:05:38PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> Currently the task always wakes affine on this_cpu if the latter is idle.
> Before waking up the task on this_cpu, we check that this_cpu capacity is not
> significantly reduced because of RT tasks or irq activity.
>
> Use case where the number of irq and/or the time spent under irq is important
> will take benefit of this because the task that is woken up by irq or softirq
> will not use the same CPU than irq (and softirq) but a idle one which share
> its cache.
The above, doesn't seem to explain:
> + } else if (!(sd->flags & SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES)) {
> + this_eff_load = 0;
> + }
> +
> + balanced = this_eff_load <= prev_eff_load;
this. Why would you unconditionally allow wake_affine across cache
domains?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-10 11:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-30 16:05 [PATCH v3 00/12] sched: consolidation of cpu_power Vincent Guittot
2014-06-30 16:05 ` [PATCH v3 01/12] sched: fix imbalance flag reset Vincent Guittot
2014-07-08 3:13 ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-07-08 10:12 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-07-09 3:54 ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-07-09 8:27 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-07-09 10:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-09 11:41 ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-07-09 14:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-10 9:14 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-07-10 9:30 ` [PATCH v4 ] " Vincent Guittot
2014-07-10 10:57 ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-07-10 11:04 ` [PATCH v3 01/12] " Preeti U Murthy
2014-07-09 3:05 ` Rik van Riel
2014-07-09 3:36 ` Rik van Riel
2014-07-09 10:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-09 10:30 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-06-30 16:05 ` [PATCH v3 02/12] sched: remove a wake_affine condition Vincent Guittot
2014-07-09 3:06 ` Rik van Riel
2014-06-30 16:05 ` [PATCH v3 03/12] sched: fix avg_load computation Vincent Guittot
2014-07-09 3:10 ` Rik van Riel
2014-06-30 16:05 ` [PATCH v3 04/12] sched: Allow all archs to set the power_orig Vincent Guittot
2014-07-09 3:11 ` Rik van Riel
2014-07-09 10:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-10 13:42 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-06-30 16:05 ` [PATCH v3 05/12] ARM: topology: use new cpu_power interface Vincent Guittot
2014-07-09 3:11 ` Rik van Riel
2014-07-09 7:49 ` Amit Kucheria
2014-07-09 10:09 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-06-30 16:05 ` [PATCH v3 06/12] sched: add per rq cpu_power_orig Vincent Guittot
2014-07-09 3:11 ` Rik van Riel
2014-07-09 7:50 ` Amit Kucheria
2014-06-30 16:05 ` [PATCH v3 07/12] sched: test the cpu's capacity in wake affine Vincent Guittot
2014-07-09 3:12 ` Rik van Riel
2014-07-10 11:06 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2014-07-10 13:58 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-06-30 16:05 ` [PATCH v3 08/12] sched: move cfs task on a CPU with higher capacity Vincent Guittot
2014-07-10 11:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-10 14:03 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-07-11 14:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-11 15:17 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-07-14 13:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-15 9:21 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-07-10 11:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-10 13:59 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-07-10 11:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-30 16:05 ` [PATCH v3 09/12] Revert "sched: Put rq's sched_avg under CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED" Vincent Guittot
2014-07-10 13:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-11 7:51 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-07-11 15:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-11 17:39 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-07-11 20:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-14 12:55 ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-07-14 13:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-14 14:04 ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-07-14 16:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-15 9:20 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-07-14 17:54 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-07-18 1:27 ` Yuyang Du
2014-07-11 16:13 ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-07-15 9:27 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-07-15 9:32 ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-07-15 9:53 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-06-30 16:05 ` [PATCH v3 10/12] sched: get CPU's utilization statistic Vincent Guittot
2014-06-30 16:05 ` [PATCH v3 11/12] sched: replace capacity_factor by utilization Vincent Guittot
2014-06-30 16:05 ` [PATCH v3 12/12] sched: add SD_PREFER_SIBLING for SMT level Vincent Guittot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140710110644.GX3935@laptop \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=Morten.Rasmussen@arm.com \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas.pitre@linaro.org \
--cc=preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox