From: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
To: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: <tglx@linutronix.de>, <mingo@redhat.com>, <hpa@zytor.com>,
<x86@kernel.org>, <toshi.kani@hp.com>, <bp@alien8.de>,
<huawei.libin@huawei.com>, <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>,
<peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86,cpu-hotplug: assign same CPU number to readded CPU
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 11:26:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140710112609.0b0eb294@nial.usersys.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53BE51CE.40208@jp.fujitsu.com>
On Thu, 10 Jul 2014 17:41:50 +0900
Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> llc_shared_map is not cleared even if CPU is offline or hot removed.
> So when hot-plugging CPU and assigning new CPU number to hot-added CPU,
> the mask has wrong value. The mask is used by CSF schduler to create
> sched_domain. So it breaks CFS scheduler.
>
> Here is a example on my system.
> My system has 4 sockets and each socket has 15 cores and HT is enabled.
> In this case, each core of sockes is numbered as follows:
>
> | CPU#
> Socket#0 | 0-14 , 60-74
> Socket#1 | 15-29, 75-89
> Socket#2 | 30-44, 90-104
> Socket#3 | 45-59, 105-119
>
> Then llc_shared_mask of CPU#30 has 0x3fff80000001fffc0000000.
> It means that last level cache of Socket#2 is shared with
> CPU#30-44 and 90-104.
>
> When hot-removing socket#2 and #3, each core of sockets is numbered
> as follows:
>
> | CPU#
> Socket#0 | 0-14 , 60-74
> Socket#1 | 15-29, 75-89
>
> But llc_shared_mask is not cleared. So llc_shared_mask of CPU#30 remains
> having 0x3fff80000001fffc0000000.
>
> After that, when hot-adding socket#2 and #3, each core of sockets is
> numbered as follows:
>
> | CPU#
> Socket#0 | 0-14 , 60-74
> Socket#1 | 15-29, 75-89
> Socket#2 | 30-59
> Socket#3 | 90-119
>
> Then llc_shared_mask of CPU#30 becomes 0x3fff8000fffffffc0000000.
> It means that last level cache of Socket#2 is shared with CPU#30-59
> and 90-104. So the mask has wrong value.
>
> At first, I cleared hot-removed CPU number's bit from llc_shared_map
> when hot removing CPU. But Borislav suggested that the problem will
> disappear if readded CPU is assigned same CPU number. And llc_shared_map
> must not be changed.
>
> So the patch assigns same CPU number to readded CPU by linking CPU
> number to APIC ID. And by the patch, the problem disappers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
> Suggested-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de1>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c
> index ad28db7..1cc715b 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c
> @@ -220,6 +220,22 @@ static void apic_pm_activate(void);
> static unsigned long apic_phys;
>
> /*
> + * Bind ACPI ID to CPU ID
> + * CPU ID to APIC ID does not change by this array even if CPU is
> + * hotplugged. So don't clear the array even if CPU is hot-removed
> + */
> +static int apicid_to_cpuid[MAX_LOCAL_APIC] = {
> + [0 ... MAX_LOCAL_APIC-1] = -1,
> +};
> +
> +/*
> + * Represent CPU ID bound to APIC
> + * Don't clear a bit even if CPU is hot-removed
> + */
> +static DECLARE_BITMAP(cpu_used_bits, CONFIG_NR_CPUS);
> +static struct cpumask *const cpu_used_mask = to_cpumask(cpu_used_bits);
> +
> +/*
> * Get the LAPIC version
> */
> static inline int lapic_get_version(void)
> @@ -2122,6 +2138,17 @@ void disconnect_bsp_APIC(int virt_wire_setup)
> apic_write(APIC_LVT1, value);
> }
>
> +static int get_cpuid(int apicid)
> +{
> + int cpuid;
> +
> + cpuid = apicid_to_cpuid[apicid];
> + if (cpuid < 0)
> + cpuid = cpumask_next_zero(-1, cpu_used_mask);
Why do you need additional cpu bitmask?
How about just finding the first apicid_to_cpuid[apicid] < 0
and dropping not needed anymore bitmask.
> +
> + return cpuid;
> +}
> +
> int generic_processor_info(int apicid, int version)
> {
> int cpu, max = nr_cpu_ids;
> @@ -2199,7 +2226,9 @@ int generic_processor_info(int apicid, int version)
> */
> cpu = 0;
> } else
> - cpu = cpumask_next_zero(-1, cpu_present_mask);
> + cpu = get_cpuid(apicid);
> +
> + apicid_to_cpuid[apicid] = cpu;
>
> /*
> * Validate version
> @@ -2228,6 +2257,7 @@ int generic_processor_info(int apicid, int version)
> early_per_cpu(x86_cpu_to_logical_apicid, cpu) =
> apic->x86_32_early_logical_apicid(cpu);
> #endif
> + cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, cpu_used_mask);
> set_cpu_possible(cpu, true);
> set_cpu_present(cpu, true);
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-10 9:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-10 8:41 [PATCH] x86,cpu-hotplug: assign same CPU number to readded CPU Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2014-07-10 9:26 ` Igor Mammedov [this message]
2014-07-11 0:48 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2014-07-11 10:59 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-07-15 4:27 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140710112609.0b0eb294@nial.usersys.redhat.com \
--to=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=huawei.libin@huawei.com \
--cc=isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=toshi.kani@hp.com \
--cc=umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox