From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
To: Liu Hua <sdu.liu@huawei.com>
Cc: "tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"jason@lakedaemon.net" <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
"nicolas.pitre@linaro.org" <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>,
"linux@arm.linux.org.uk" <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
"ebiederm@xmission.com" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"wangnan0@huawei.com" <wangnan0@huawei.com>,
"liuxueliu.liu@huawei.com" <liuxueliu.liu@huawei.com>,
"peifeiyue@huawei.com" <peifeiyue@huawei.com>,
"liusdu@huawei.com" <liusdu@huawei.com>,
marc.zyngier@arm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] irqchip: GIC: check and clear GIC interupt active status
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 13:35:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140711123507.GE12899@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1405061177-43834-1-git-send-email-sdu.liu@huawei.com>
[adding Marc]
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 07:46:15AM +0100, Liu Hua wrote:
> For this version of GIC codes, kernel assumes that all the interrupt
> status of GIC is inactive. So the kernel does not check this when
> booting.
>
> This is no problem on must sitations. But when kdump is deplayed.
> And a panic occurs when a interrupt is being handled (may be PPI
> and SPI). We have no chance to write relative bit to GICC_EOIR.
> So this interrupt remains active. And GIC will not deliver this
> type interrupt to cpu interface. And the capture kernel may
> fail to boot becase of lacking of certain interrupt (such as timer
> interupt).
>
>
> I glanced over the GIC Architecture Specification, but did not
> find a simple way to deactive state of all interrupts. For GICv1,
> I can only deal with one abnormal interrupt state one time. For
> GICv2, I can deactive 32 one time.
>
>
> So guys, Do you know a better way to do that?
What happens if, in the crash kernel, you disable the CPU interfaces
(GICC_CTLR.ENABLE) then disable the distributor (GICD_CTLR.ENABLE) before
enabling everything again in the reverse order? Is that enough to cause the
GIC to drop any active states? It's not clear to me from a quick look at
the TRM.
Will
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-11 12:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-11 6:46 [RFC PATCH 0/2] irqchip: GIC: check and clear GIC interupt active status Liu Hua
2014-07-11 6:46 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] irqchip: GIC: introduce ICPIDR2 register interface Liu Hua
2014-07-11 6:46 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] irqchip: GIC: introduce method to deactive interupts Liu Hua
2014-07-11 12:35 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2014-07-14 3:22 ` [RFC PATCH 0/2] irqchip: GIC: check and clear GIC interupt active status Liu hua
2014-07-14 9:57 ` Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140711123507.GE12899@arm.com \
--to=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=liusdu@huawei.com \
--cc=liuxueliu.liu@huawei.com \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=nicolas.pitre@linaro.org \
--cc=peifeiyue@huawei.com \
--cc=sdu.liu@huawei.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=wangnan0@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox