From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Alexander Yarygin <yarygin@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Corey Ashford <cjashfor@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] perf: Destroy event's children on task exit
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 22:18:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140714201854.GJ17761@krava.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140714111833.GU19379@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 01:18:33PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 01:56:19PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
> >
> > When task exits we close:
> > 1) all events that are installed in task
> > 2) all events owned by task (via file descriptor)
> >
> > But we don't close children events of 2) events. Those children
> > events stay until the child task exits and are useless with the
> > parent being gone, because we have no way to get to values any
> > more.
> >
> > Plus if the event stays installed in task even with the owner task
> > gone, it runs the perf callback any time the task forks, for no
> > real reason.
> >
> > Closing all children events events when the owner task of the
> > parent event is closed.
>
> Do we need this for the other patches, or is this an unrelated change?
>
> > Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
> > ---
> > kernel/events/core.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
> > index 71a56ae..37797dd 100644
> > --- a/kernel/events/core.c
> > +++ b/kernel/events/core.c
> > @@ -7535,6 +7535,32 @@ static void perf_event_exit_task_context(struct task_struct *child, int ctxn)
> > put_ctx(child_ctx);
> > }
> >
> > +static void perf_event_exit_children(struct perf_event *parent)
> > +{
> > + struct perf_event *child, *tmp;
> > +
> > + mutex_lock(&parent->child_mutex);
> > + list_for_each_entry_safe(child, tmp, &parent->child_list,
> > + child_list) {
> > + struct perf_event_context *child_ctx = child->ctx;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Child events got removed from child_list under
> > + * child_mutex and then freed. So it's safe to access
> > + * childs context in here, because the child holds
> > + * context ref.
> > + */
> > + mutex_lock(&child_ctx->mutex);
> > + perf_remove_from_context(child, true);
> > + mutex_unlock(&child_ctx->mutex);
> > +
> > + list_del_init(&child->child_list);
> > + put_event(parent);
> > + free_event(child);
> > + }
> > + mutex_unlock(&parent->child_mutex);
> > +}
> > +
> > /*
> > * When a child task exits, feed back event values to parent events.
> > */
> > @@ -7555,6 +7581,7 @@ void perf_event_exit_task(struct task_struct *child)
> > */
> > smp_wmb();
> > event->owner = NULL;
> > + perf_event_exit_children(event);
> > }
> > mutex_unlock(&child->perf_event_mutex);
>
> I don't think this is correct, perf_event_init_context() can come in
> concurrently and the first place it runs into ->child_mutex is after its
> already allocated and created the (first) child event.
just noticed this.. I'm working on the other version we decide, but FWIW
there's also mutex_lock(&child_ctx->mutex); before removing the context,
that should protect it against perf_event_init_context call
jirka
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-14 20:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-11 11:56 [PATCH 0/5] perf: Fix tracepoint events permissions check Jiri Olsa
2014-07-11 11:56 ` [PATCH 1/5] perf: Make perf_init_event function static Jiri Olsa
2014-07-11 11:56 ` [PATCH 2/5] perf: Destroy event's children on task exit Jiri Olsa
2014-07-11 13:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-11 13:31 ` Jiri Olsa
2014-07-16 12:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2014-07-14 11:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-14 11:43 ` Jiri Olsa
2014-07-14 13:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-14 13:22 ` Jiri Olsa
2014-07-14 13:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-14 14:21 ` Jiri Olsa
2014-07-16 12:14 ` Jiri Olsa
2014-07-14 20:18 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2014-07-15 9:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-15 9:31 ` Jiri Olsa
2014-07-11 11:56 ` [PATCH 3/5] perf: Initialize owner before calling event_init callback Jiri Olsa
2014-07-11 11:56 ` [PATCH 4/5] perf: Move event owner retrieval into perf_event_get_owner Jiri Olsa
2014-07-11 11:56 ` [PATCH 5/5] perf: Check event's owner permission in tracepoint init callback Jiri Olsa
2014-07-11 12:02 ` [PATCH 0/5] perf: Fix tracepoint events permissions check Jiri Olsa
2014-07-28 8:28 ` [tip:perf/core] perf: Check permission only for parent tracepoint event tip-bot for Jiri Olsa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140714201854.GJ17761@krava.redhat.com \
--to=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=cjashfor@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=yarygin@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox