[PATCH 95/95] Staging: commedi: 8253.h: style issue fixed

[PATCH 95/95] Staging: commedi: 8253.h: style issue fixed

[Sam Asadi]

a revision to the file that previously had several style issues.
It's clean now.

Signed-off-by: Sam Asadi <asadi.samuel@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/8253.h |    1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/8253.h b/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/8253.h
index 31d0fc9..d320027 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/8253.h
+++ b/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/8253.h
@@ -282,6 +282,7 @@ static inline void i8254_mm_write(void __iomem *base_address,
  * OR'ed with:
  *   I8254_BCD, I8254_BINARY
  */
+
 static inline int i8254_set_mode(unsigned long base_address,
 				 unsigned int regshift,
 				 unsigned int counter_number, unsigned int mode)
-- 
1.7.10.4

Re: [PATCH 95/95] Staging: commedi: 8253.h: style issue fixed

[Greg KH]

Patch 95/95?  Really?  Where are the other 94 patches in this series?

:(

Please look at what you are doing here, does it make sense?

On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 08:04:35PM +0300, Sam Asadi wrote:
> a revision to the file that previously had several style issues.
> It's clean now.

What does this mean?  What did you do in this changeset?  Describe _why_
you made the change, not the result of what happened _after_ this patch
is applied.

Please step back, take a day or two to regroup, and revisit what you are
trying to do here.  You are not sending out patches correctly at all.
Please read some tutorials on how to do this properly (try
kernelnewbies.org) and then do a dry-run by sending the patches to
yourself.

After that looks correct, then consider sending them to the kernel
developers.

But again, wait, don't rush, there's no deadline here.

greg k-h