From: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
To: Boaz Harrosh <openosd@gmail.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
pramod.gurav.etc@gmail.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
Markus Mayer <markus.mayer@linaro.org>,
Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/direct-io.c: Fix compilation warning for uninitialized variables
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 13:56:03 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140716175603.GD13108@titan.lakedaemon.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53C6B199.2070606@gmail.com>
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 08:08:41PM +0300, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> On 07/13/2014 02:50 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > pramod.gurav.etc@gmail.com wrote ...
> >> diff --git a/fs/direct-io.c b/fs/direct-io.c
> >> index 98040ba388ac..c0a9854d2bc7 100644
> >> --- a/fs/direct-io.c
> >> +++ b/fs/direct-io.c
> >> @@ -910,7 +910,8 @@ static int do_direct_IO(struct dio *dio, struct dio_submit *sdio,
> >>
> >> while (sdio->block_in_file < sdio->final_block_in_request) {
> >> struct page *page;
> >> - size_t from, to;
> >> + size_t from = 0;
> >> + size_t to = 0;
> >> page = dio_get_page(dio, sdio, &from, &to);
> >> if (IS_ERR(page)) {
> >> ret = PTR_ERR(page);
> > Looks good to me,
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> >
> > Al, can you pick this up? It's the only warnings in many of my usual
> > kernel builds at the moment.
> >
> <>
>
> Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl> wrote ...
> <>
> > @@ -911,11 +907,15 @@ static int do_direct_IO(struct dio *dio, struct dio_submit *sdio,
> > while (sdio->block_in_file < sdio->final_block_in_request) {
> > struct page *page;
> > size_t from, to;
> > - page = dio_get_page(dio, sdio, &from, &to);
> > +
> > + page = dio_get_page(dio, sdio);
> > if (IS_ERR(page)) {
> > ret = PTR_ERR(page);
> > goto out;
> > }
> > + from = sdio->head ? 0 : sdio->from;
> > + to = (sdio->head == sdio->tail - 1) ? sdio->to : PAGE_SIZE;
> > + sdio->head++;
> >
> > while (from < to) {
> > unsigned this_chunk_bytes; /* # of bytes mapped */
> <>
>
> This is the wrong fix. GCC is wrong here. As shown by Paul Bolle if
> you move the from / to set from dio_get_page() to here the warning goes away.
Actually, that was me.
> The minimal fix must use uninitialized_var() in this case. See patch below
I didn't know about uninitialized_var() when I wrote the patch. As the
comment for it states:
/*
* A trick to suppress uninitialized variable warning without generating
* any code
*/
So,
> But I think the proper fix Is the one Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl> sent (above)
>
>
> ----
> From: Boaz Harrosh <boaz@plexistor.com>
> Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 20:02:29 +0300
> Subject: [PATCH] do_direct_IO: Fix compiler warning
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
>
> This fixes
> ../fs/direct-io.c: In function ‘do_blockdev_direct_IO’:
> ../fs/direct-io.c:1011:12: warning: ‘from’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
> u = (to - from) >> blkbits;
> ^
> ../fs/direct-io.c:1011:12: warning: ‘to’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
> u = (to - from) >> blkbits;
>
> I use: gcc version 4.8.3 20140624 (Red Hat 4.8.3-1)
>
> GCC is wrong here so we should use the uninitialized_var() macro
> and not silence it with = 0;
>
> Signed-off-by: Boaz Harrosh <boaz@plexistor.com>
Acked-by: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
thx,
Jason.
> ---
> fs/direct-io.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/direct-io.c b/fs/direct-io.c
> index 98040ba..156e6f0 100644
> --- a/fs/direct-io.c
> +++ b/fs/direct-io.c
> @@ -910,7 +910,8 @@ static int do_direct_IO(struct dio *dio, struct dio_submit *sdio,
>
> while (sdio->block_in_file < sdio->final_block_in_request) {
> struct page *page;
> - size_t from, to;
> + size_t uninitialized_var(from), uninitialized_var(to);
> +
> page = dio_get_page(dio, sdio, &from, &to);
> if (IS_ERR(page)) {
> ret = PTR_ERR(page);
> --
> 1.9.3
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-16 17:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-04 5:43 [PATCH] fs/direct-io.c: Fix compilation warning for uninitialized variables pramod.gurav.etc
2014-07-13 11:50 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-07-14 7:04 ` pramod gurav
2014-07-16 17:08 ` Boaz Harrosh
2014-07-16 17:56 ` Jason Cooper [this message]
2014-07-16 17:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-07-16 18:42 ` Paul Bolle
2014-07-17 9:37 ` direct-io: squelch maybe-uninitialized warning in do_direct_IO() Boaz Harrosh
2014-07-17 9:40 ` Boaz Harrosh
2014-07-17 9:54 ` Paul Bolle
2014-07-17 9:48 ` Paul Bolle
2014-07-17 11:00 ` Boaz Harrosh
2014-07-17 11:11 ` [PATCH v2] " Boaz Harrosh
2014-07-17 11:29 ` Paul Bolle
2014-07-20 9:09 ` [PATCH v3] direct-io: fix uninitialized " Boaz Harrosh
2014-07-21 11:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-07-22 9:03 ` Boaz Harrosh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140716175603.GD13108@titan.lakedaemon.net \
--to=jason@lakedaemon.net \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=markus.mayer@linaro.org \
--cc=openosd@gmail.com \
--cc=pebolle@tiscali.nl \
--cc=pramod.gurav.etc@gmail.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox