From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org,
"linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
Alexander Kolesnikov <akolesni@codeaurora.org>,
Konstantin Dorfman <kdorfman@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: char interface to sdio, chdio.c
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 16:11:46 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140716231146.GA13500@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53C705DB.3040700@codeaurora.org>
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 04:08:11PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 07/16/14 12:38, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > On 07/16/14 11:44, Greg KH wrote:
> >> My specific question is why 2 different interfaces?
> > Ok. It definitely looks odd to support set/get of the VDD with sysfs and
> > ioctl interfaces. I'm just guessing, but I suspect it's a permissions
> > thing given that the patch that introduces the VDD stuff also updates
> > the permissions of the device node. Of course, the commit text only
> > mentions an ioctl, nothing about sysfs. The only other sysfs stuff seems
> > to be module parameters to change the vendor ids.
> >
> > I'll have to go repo diving to figure out if the sysfs interface was
> > ever used. Maybe Alex or Konstantin can respond before I have to do that.
> >
> >
>
> I couldn't find any usage of the sysfs interface. The only thing I see
> used is the host_name field when the module is inserted, if that even
> happens at all (I'm not sure because it's behind some ifdef that may or
> may not be defined). Sorry this doesn't explain why there are two
> different interfaces for the VDD stuff. Hopefully Alex or Konstantin can
> help.
Thanks for looking.
Alex and/or Konstantin, any objection to me removing the sysfs interface
on this driver, and just using the char device ioctl hellhole^WAPI
instead?
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-16 23:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-16 3:26 char interface to sdio, chdio.c Greg KH
2014-07-16 18:21 ` Stephen Boyd
2014-07-16 18:44 ` Greg KH
2014-07-16 19:38 ` Stephen Boyd
2014-07-16 23:08 ` Stephen Boyd
2014-07-16 23:11 ` Greg KH [this message]
2014-07-17 5:33 ` Greg KH
2014-07-17 10:17 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-07-18 3:08 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140716231146.GA13500@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=akolesni@codeaurora.org \
--cc=kdorfman@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox