From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@gmail.com>
Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>,
"open list:READ-COPY UPDATE..." <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] rcu: Remove redundant checks for rcu_scheduler_fully_active
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 16:40:27 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140717234027.GC8690@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1405475402-7181-1-git-send-email-bobby.prani@gmail.com>
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 09:50:02PM -0400, Pranith Kumar wrote:
> rcu_scheduler_fully_active is set to true early in the boot process.
>
> rcu_prepare_kthreads() is called in two locations. Once after setting the above
> flag and the other while hotplugging a CPU from rcu_cpu_notify(). CPU hotplug is
> enabled much later by which time the above flag is already set. Hence checking
> for this flag is redundant in this function.
>
> The checks in rcu_spawn_one_boost_kthread() and rcu_spawn_all_nocb_kthreads()
> are similarly redundant.
>
> This commit removes the redundant checks for this flag from the above
> locations.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@gmail.com>
Good catch! Queued for 3.18.
Thanx, Paul
> ---
> kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h | 10 ++++------
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
> index 17ccb62..a2113f6 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
> @@ -1341,7 +1341,7 @@ static int rcu_spawn_one_boost_kthread(struct rcu_state *rsp,
> if (&rcu_preempt_state != rsp)
> return 0;
>
> - if (!rcu_scheduler_fully_active || rnp->qsmaskinit == 0)
> + if (rnp->qsmaskinit == 0)
> return 0;
>
> rsp->boost = 1;
> @@ -1489,8 +1489,7 @@ static void rcu_prepare_kthreads(int cpu)
> struct rcu_node *rnp = rdp->mynode;
>
> /* Fire up the incoming CPU's kthread and leaf rcu_node kthread. */
> - if (rcu_scheduler_fully_active)
> - (void)rcu_spawn_one_boost_kthread(rcu_state_p, rnp);
> + (void)rcu_spawn_one_boost_kthread(rcu_state_p, rnp);
> }
>
> #else /* #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_BOOST */
> @@ -2509,9 +2508,8 @@ static void rcu_spawn_all_nocb_kthreads(int cpu)
> {
> struct rcu_state *rsp;
>
> - if (rcu_scheduler_fully_active)
> - for_each_rcu_flavor(rsp)
> - rcu_spawn_one_nocb_kthread(rsp, cpu);
> + for_each_rcu_flavor(rsp)
> + rcu_spawn_one_nocb_kthread(rsp, cpu);
> }
>
> /*
> --
> 1.9.1
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-17 23:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-16 1:50 [PATCH 1/1] rcu: Remove redundant checks for rcu_scheduler_fully_active Pranith Kumar
2014-07-17 23:40 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140717234027.GC8690@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=bobby.prani@gmail.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox