From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759011AbaGRB1b (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jul 2014 21:27:31 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:37375 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752760AbaGRB1a (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jul 2014 21:27:30 -0400 Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 18:27:29 -0700 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Himangi Saraogi Cc: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, Lars-Peter Clausen , linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Julia Lawall , Jonathan Cameron Subject: Re: question regarding drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7280a.c Message-ID: <20140718012729.GA24211@kroah.com> References: <53C5656F.9030200@kernel.org> <53C65E8F.2080708@metafoo.de> <20140717205815.GB1532@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140717205815.GB1532@kroah.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 01:58:15PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 11:40:04PM +0530, Himangi Saraogi wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have sent in a patch for adding devm_kasprintf https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/7/ > > 16/667. > > I will be updating this file and send in a patch once it is accepted. Was it > > the right thing > > to do to send the devm_kasprintf patch separately from the patch on the file to > > use it for, > > because the person applying the later may not see the dependency? > > Well, you should have told me there was a dependancy :) > > As I'll end up taking both of these patches in the end, I'll queue your > devm_kasprintf patch up in my staging-next tree so that it will work > properly with your patch. Now applied there, so all should be good, right? thanks, greg k-h