public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "hch@infradead.org" <hch@infradead.org>
To: KY Srinivasan <kys@microsoft.com>
Cc: James Bottomley <jbottomley@parallels.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"hch@infradead.org" <hch@infradead.org>,
	"apw@canonical.com" <apw@canonical.com>,
	"devel@linuxdriverproject.org" <devel@linuxdriverproject.org>,
	"michaelc@cs.wisc.edu" <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>,
	"axboe@kernel.dk" <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"ohering@suse.com" <ohering@suse.com>,
	"gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"jasowang@redhat.com" <jasowang@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] [SCSI] Fix a bug in deriving the FLUSH_TIMEOUT from the basic I/O timeout
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 10:15:19 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140718171519.GA5984@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140718171238.GA3159@infradead.org>

On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 10:12:38AM -0700, hch@infradead.org wrote:
> This is what I plan to put in after it passes basic testing:

And that one was on top of my previous version.  One that applies
against core-for-3.17 below:

---
>From 8a79783e5f72ec034a724e16c1f46604bd97bf68 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 17:11:27 +0200
Subject: sd: fix a bug in deriving the FLUSH_TIMEOUT from the basic I/O
 timeout

Commit ID: 7e660100d85af860e7ad763202fff717adcdaacd added code to derive the
FLUSH_TIMEOUT from the basic I/O timeout. However, this patch did not use the
basic I/O timeout of the device. Fix this bug.

Signed-off-by: K. Y. Srinivasan <kys@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: James Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
 drivers/scsi/sd.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sd.c b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
index 377a520..9ffb393 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/sd.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
@@ -880,7 +880,7 @@ static int sd_setup_flush_cmnd(struct scsi_cmnd *cmd)
 	cmd->transfersize = 0;
 	cmd->allowed = SD_MAX_RETRIES;
 
-	rq->timeout *= SD_FLUSH_TIMEOUT_MULTIPLIER;
+	rq->timeout = rq->q->rq_timeout * SD_FLUSH_TIMEOUT_MULTIPLIER;
 	return BLKPREP_OK;
 }
 
-- 
1.9.1


  reply	other threads:[~2014-07-18 17:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-06-04 16:33 [PATCH 1/1] [SCSI] Fix a bug in deriving the FLUSH_TIMEOUT from the basic I/O timeout K. Y. Srinivasan
2014-06-04 17:02 ` James Bottomley
2014-06-04 17:15   ` KY Srinivasan
2014-06-06  1:32     ` Mike Christie
2014-06-06  2:53       ` KY Srinivasan
2014-06-06 17:18         ` Mike Christie
2014-06-06 17:52           ` James Bottomley
2014-06-06 18:22             ` Jens Axboe
2014-06-20 21:36               ` KY Srinivasan
2014-07-17 23:53                 ` KY Srinivasan
2014-07-18  0:51                   ` Elliott, Robert (Server Storage)
2014-07-18 15:11                     ` Christoph Hellwig (hch@infradead.org)
2014-07-18 15:39                     ` James Bottomley
2014-07-18 17:17                       ` Elliott, Robert (Server Storage)
2014-07-18 17:41                         ` James Bottomley
2014-07-18 18:16                           ` Douglas Gilbert
2014-07-18 15:10                   ` Christoph Hellwig (hch@infradead.org)
2014-07-18 16:44                     ` KY Srinivasan
2014-07-18 16:57                       ` James Bottomley
2014-07-18 17:01                         ` hch
2014-07-18 17:05                         ` KY Srinivasan
2014-07-18 17:12                           ` hch
2014-07-18 17:15                             ` hch [this message]
2014-07-18 17:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-07-18 17:03   ` James Bottomley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140718171519.GA5984@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=apw@canonical.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=devel@linuxdriverproject.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=jbottomley@parallels.com \
    --cc=kys@microsoft.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michaelc@cs.wisc.edu \
    --cc=ohering@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox