From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org,
laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
josh@joshtriplett.org, tglx@linutronix.de, rostedt@goodmis.org,
dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, dvhart@linux.intel.com,
oleg@redhat.com, bobby.prani@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu] Do not keep timekeeping CPU tick running for non-nohz_full= CPUs
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2014 20:28:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140719182859.GJ3935@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140719180120.GA20887@localhost.localdomain>
On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 08:01:24PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> This can be changed by allowing timekeeping duty from all non-nohz_full CPUs, that's
> the initial direction I took, but it involved a lot of complications and scalability
> issues.
How so, currently any CPU can be timekeeper, how is any !nohz_full cpu
different?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-19 18:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-19 16:53 [PATCH tip/core/rcu] Do not keep timekeeping CPU tick running for non-nohz_full= CPUs Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-19 17:19 ` Josh Triplett
2014-07-19 18:01 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-07-19 18:28 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2014-07-20 0:35 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-07-20 11:47 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-20 20:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-21 15:57 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-21 17:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-21 17:33 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-23 16:23 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-07-23 16:31 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-23 16:50 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-07-23 15:57 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-07-20 22:12 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-07-21 15:59 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-23 16:02 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-07-24 4:24 ` Mike Galbraith
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140719182859.GJ3935@laptop \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bobby.prani@gmail.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox