From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, x86-ml <x86@kernel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, TSC: Add a software TSC offset
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 09:57:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140722075729.GX3935@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrX1LbZAiPH4x2Uby_cUUj2wgN92wc+5wvf-B3_9XdObWQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 02:56:49PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > Remember, this is only attempting to be a hardware workaround for a
> > smallish number of systems out there. Most of current machines should
> > have stable and synched TSCs.
>
> I actually own one of these systems. It's a Sandy Bridge Core-i7
> Extreme or something like that.
If it is (and it sounds like it is) a single socket, then your unsynced
TSC is likely due to SMM fuckery and the TSCs will drift further and
further apart as (run)time increases due to SMM activity.
The problem Borislav is talking about is multi socket systems, which due
to (failed) board layout get the CPUs powered up 'wrong' and the TSCs
between sockets is offset because of this, its a fixed offset and stable
forever after (until power cycle etc..).
I have one WSM-EP that does this (occasionally).
His initial idea was to re-write the TSC value to match, but since
writing the TSC is expensive (in the 1000s of cycles range) getting an
offset adjustment of 10s of cycles in just right is nigh on impossible.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-22 7:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-19 13:06 [PATCH] x86, TSC: Add a software TSC offset Borislav Petkov
2014-07-19 13:28 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-07-21 19:34 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-07-21 21:35 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-07-21 21:41 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-07-21 21:52 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-07-21 21:56 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-07-21 22:06 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-07-21 22:11 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-07-21 22:14 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-07-21 22:08 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-07-21 22:13 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-07-21 22:30 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-07-21 22:43 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-07-21 23:01 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-07-22 8:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-22 7:57 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2014-07-22 2:40 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-07-22 8:59 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-07-22 12:05 ` Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140722075729.GX3935@laptop \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox