From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>
Cc: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
Baruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] sched_clock: Track monotonic raw clock
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 18:34:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140722163437.GI3935@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1406045849.25343.72.camel@hornet>
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 05:17:29PM +0100, Pawel Moll wrote:
> With both Ingo and John showing preference towards the clock alignment,
> so that's where I looked this time (I've already done custom perf
> ioctls, posix clocks... don't really know how many different ways I've
> tried).
So we should probably also talk about which clock to track, MONO has the
advantage of making it far easier to trace clusters but has the
disadvantage of stacked control loops with NTP adjusting MONO and us
adjusting sched_clock.
And I would really prefer to pick 1 and not make it configurable.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-22 16:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-18 17:43 [RFC] sched_clock: Track monotonic raw clock Pawel Moll
2014-07-18 17:51 ` John Stultz
2014-07-18 19:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-22 16:17 ` Pawel Moll
2014-07-18 19:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-18 19:25 ` John Stultz
2014-07-18 19:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-18 19:46 ` John Stultz
2014-07-18 20:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-18 22:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-22 16:17 ` Pawel Moll
2014-07-22 16:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-22 16:17 ` Pawel Moll
2014-07-19 5:02 ` Richard Cochran
2014-07-22 16:17 ` Pawel Moll
2014-07-22 16:34 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2014-07-22 16:48 ` Pawel Moll
2014-07-22 19:39 ` Richard Cochran
2014-09-12 11:45 ` Pawel Moll
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140722163437.GI3935@laptop \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baruch@tkos.co.il \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
--cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox