From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Dirk Gouders <dirk@gouders.net>,
mmarek@suse.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] kbuild: Support split debug info v3
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 20:05:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140723180501.GA15749@ravnborg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140720211901.GQ5803@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 02:19:01PM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > Why are as only called with -Wa,-gdwarf-2 in the non-split case?
> > Is this a bug or intentional?
> > If it is intentional then it is not explained.
>
> Probably was a merging mistake. Will fix.
>
> > > + help
> > > + Generate debug info into separate .dwo files. This can be
> > > + faster for building than including the debug information directly
> > Here the "faster" part is promoted.
> > But in your cover letter you actually highlight the "smaller" case
> > as more significant.
> > Maybe include info on both positive items.
>
> I currently don't see it significantly faster in my setup, will
> mention size. It may be in others though. Feel free to test.
I tried to test this on my setup - it is a Intel Atom with 2 cores.
16 GB RAM, a 7200 RPM stat disk.
In other words a low-spec setup.
Base config was "make allnoconfig"
make KCFLAGS=-g
real 3m35.967s
user 12m19.270s
sys 1m15.082s
make KCFLAGS=-gsplit-dwarf
real 3m33.366s
user 12m11.156s
sys 1m17.772s
I did like this:
echo time make -j4 -s KCFLAGS=-gsplit-dwarf
time make -j4 -s KCFLAGS=-gsplit-dwarf
echo time make -j4 -s KCFLAGS=-g
time make -j4 -s KCFLAGS=-g
echo time make -j4 -s KCFLAGS=-gsplit-dwarf
time make -j4 -s KCFLAGS=-gsplit-dwarf
echo time make -j4 -s KCFLAGS=-g
time make -j4 -s KCFLAGS=-g
echo time make -j4 -s KCFLAGS=-gsplit-dwarf
time make -j4 -s KCFLAGS=-gsplit-dwarf
echo time make -j4 -s KCFLAGS=-g
time make -j4 -s KCFLAGS=-g
The figures are from last run - but the other runs had compareable times.
So in short I see a ~3 seconds speedup - out of 210 seconds.
Thats less than I anticipated.
But a speed-up never the less - which was consistent over all three runs.
Sam
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-23 18:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-15 23:16 [PATCH 1/2] kbuild: Support split debug info v3 Andi Kleen
2014-07-15 23:16 ` [PATCH 2/2] Kbuild: Add a option to enable dwarf4 Andi Kleen
2014-07-20 19:23 ` Sam Ravnborg
2014-07-20 21:17 ` Andi Kleen
2014-07-20 19:04 ` [PATCH 1/2] kbuild: Support split debug info v3 Sam Ravnborg
2014-07-20 21:19 ` Andi Kleen
2014-07-23 18:05 ` Sam Ravnborg [this message]
2014-07-23 18:28 ` Andi Kleen
2014-07-24 8:10 ` Dirk Gouders
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-05-16 22:06 Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140723180501.GA15749@ravnborg.org \
--to=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=dirk@gouders.net \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mmarek@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox