From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Linux PCI <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI / PM: Make PCIe PME interrupts wake up from "freeze" sleep state
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 15:42:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140724134241.GZ6758@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <12684812.i3F8JrYCl0@vostro.rjw.lan>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2829 bytes --]
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 10:46:26PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
>
> The "freeze" sleep state, also known as suspend-to-idle, is entered
> without taking nonboot CPUs offline, right after devices have been
> suspended. It works by waiting for at least one wakeup source object
> to become "active" as a result of handling a hardware interrupt.
>
> Of course, interrupts supposed to be able to wake up the system from
> suspend-to-idle cannot be disabled by suspend_device_irqs() and their
> interrupt handlers must be able to cope with interrupts coming after
> all devices have been suspended. In that case, they only need to
> call __pm_wakeup_event() for a single wakeup source object without
> trying to access hardware (that will be resumed later as part of
> the subsequent system resume).
>
> Make PCIe PME interrupts work this way.
>
> Register an additional wakeup source object for each PCIe PME
> service device. That object will be used to generate wakeups from
> suspend-to-idle.
>
> Add IRQF_NO_SUSPEND to PME interrupt flags. This will make
> suspend_device_irqs() to ignore PME interrupts, but that's OK,
> because the PME interrupt handler is suspend-aware anyway and
> can cope with interrupts coming during system suspend-resume.
>
> For each PCIe port with PME service during the "prepare" phase of
> system suspend walk the bus below it and see if any devices on that
> bus are configured for wakeup. If so, mark the port as one that can
> be used for system wakeup signaling and handle it differenty going
> forward.
>
> Namely, while suspending its PME service, do not disable the PME
> interrupt, but only set a "suspended" flag for the PME service to
> make the interrupt handler behave in a special way, which is to call
> __pm_wakeup_event() with the service's wakeup source object as the
> first argument whenever the interrupt is triggered.
>
> The "suspended" flag is cleared while resuming the PME service and
> the "wakeup" flag is cleared at the "complete" stage of system
> resume.
>
> This change allows Wake-on-LAN to be used for wakeup from
> suspend-to-idle on my MSI Wind tesbed netbook.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> ---
> - ret = request_irq(srv->irq, pcie_pme_irq, IRQF_SHARED, "PCIe PME", srv);
> + ret = request_irq(srv->irq, pcie_pme_irq, IRQF_SHARED | IRQF_NO_SUSPEND,
> + "PCIe PME", srv);
So with this patch on:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=140620918218199
This will not work on my machine, because aerdrv is requesting the same
irq.
Now I've not a f'cking clue what aerdrv is, and whether it too wants
NO_SUSPEND on or not.
But if I make it also request NO_SUSPEND it all starts working.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-24 13:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-23 20:46 [PATCH] PCI / PM: Make PCIe PME interrupts wake up from "freeze" sleep state Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-07-24 13:42 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2014-07-24 15:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-07-24 15:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-07-24 17:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-27 23:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140724134241.GZ6758@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox