From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org,
laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
josh@joshtriplett.org, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org,
rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com,
dvhart@linux.intel.com, oleg@redhat.com, bobby.prani@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 1/2] Eliminate redundant rcu_sysidle_state variable
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 16:29:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140724142911.GA25788@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140723162851.GA17665@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 09:28:52AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> Now that we have rcu_state_p, which references rcu_preempt_state for
> TREE_PREEMPT_RCU and rcu_sched_state for TREE_RCU, we don't need a
> separate rcu_sysidle_state variable. This commit therefore eliminates
> rcu_preempt_state in favor of rcu_state_p.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
>
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
> index 24f5bd54ca9b..e31fa71c4d3a 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
> @@ -2662,16 +2662,6 @@ static void __maybe_unused rcu_kick_nohz_cpu(int cpu)
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL_SYSIDLE
>
> -/*
> - * Define RCU flavor that holds sysidle state. This needs to be the
> - * most active flavor of RCU.
> - */
> -#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU
> -static struct rcu_state *rcu_sysidle_state = &rcu_preempt_state;
> -#else /* #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU */
> -static struct rcu_state *rcu_sysidle_state = &rcu_sched_state;
> -#endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU */
> -
> static int full_sysidle_state; /* Current system-idle state. */
> #define RCU_SYSIDLE_NOT 0 /* Some CPU is not idle. */
> #define RCU_SYSIDLE_SHORT 1 /* All CPUs idle for brief period. */
> @@ -2813,7 +2803,7 @@ static void rcu_sysidle_check_cpu(struct rcu_data *rdp, bool *isidle,
> * not the flavor of RCU that tracks sysidle state, or if this
> * is an offline or the timekeeping CPU, nothing to do.
> */
> - if (!*isidle || rdp->rsp != rcu_sysidle_state ||
> + if (!*isidle || rdp->rsp != rcu_state_p ||
> cpu_is_offline(rdp->cpu) || rdp->cpu == tick_do_timer_cpu)
> return;
> if (rcu_gp_in_progress(rdp->rsp))
> @@ -2839,7 +2829,7 @@ static void rcu_sysidle_check_cpu(struct rcu_data *rdp, bool *isidle,
> */
> static bool is_sysidle_rcu_state(struct rcu_state *rsp)
> {
> - return rsp == rcu_sysidle_state;
> + return rsp == rcu_state_p;
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -2917,7 +2907,7 @@ static void rcu_sysidle_cancel(void)
> static void rcu_sysidle_report(struct rcu_state *rsp, int isidle,
> unsigned long maxj, bool gpkt)
> {
> - if (rsp != rcu_sysidle_state)
> + if (rsp != rcu_state_p)
> return; /* Wrong flavor, ignore. */
> if (gpkt && nr_cpu_ids <= CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL_SYSIDLE_SMALL)
> return; /* Running state machine from timekeeping CPU. */
> @@ -2986,13 +2976,12 @@ bool rcu_sys_is_idle(void)
>
> /* Scan all the CPUs looking for nonidle CPUs. */
> for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> - rdp = per_cpu_ptr(rcu_sysidle_state->rda, cpu);
> + rdp = per_cpu_ptr(rcu_state_p->rda, cpu);
> rcu_sysidle_check_cpu(rdp, &isidle, &maxj);
> if (!isidle)
> break;
> }
> - rcu_sysidle_report(rcu_sysidle_state,
> - isidle, maxj, false);
> + rcu_sysidle_report(rcu_state_p, isidle, maxj, false);
> oldrss = rss;
> rss = ACCESS_ONCE(full_sysidle_state);
> }
> @@ -3019,7 +3008,7 @@ bool rcu_sys_is_idle(void)
> * provided by the memory allocator.
> */
> if (nr_cpu_ids > CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL_SYSIDLE_SMALL &&
> - !rcu_gp_in_progress(rcu_sysidle_state) &&
> + !rcu_gp_in_progress(rcu_state_p) &&
> !rsh.inuse && xchg(&rsh.inuse, 1) == 0)
> call_rcu(&rsh.rh, rcu_sysidle_cb);
> return false;
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-24 14:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-23 16:28 [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 1/2] Eliminate redundant rcu_sysidle_state variable Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-23 16:29 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 2/2] Don't track sysidle state if no nohz_full= CPUs Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-24 14:58 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-07-23 23:43 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 1/2] Eliminate redundant rcu_sysidle_state variable Pranith Kumar
2014-07-24 14:29 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140724142911.GA25788@localhost.localdomain \
--to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bobby.prani@gmail.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox