public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@gmail.com>
Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	"open list:READ-COPY UPDATE..." <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] rcu: Check the return value of rcu_nocb_mask cpumask allocation
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 08:25:51 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140725152551.GC11241@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1406248652-17416-2-git-send-email-bobby.prani@gmail.com>

On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 08:37:32PM -0400, Pranith Kumar wrote:
> This commit checks the return value of the zalloc_cpumask_var() used for
> allocating cpumask for rcu_nocb_mask.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@gmail.com>

Hmmm...  I saw the check in the previous patch, but didn't see removal
of the later have_rcu_nocb_mask check.  Please see below.

							Thanx, Paul

> ---
> v2: no change from v1
> 
>  kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h | 23 ++++++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
> index 520538a..9c9a01c 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
> @@ -54,7 +54,10 @@ static void __init rcu_bootup_announce_oddness_nocb(void)
>  {
>  #ifndef CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_NONE
>  	if (!have_rcu_nocb_mask) {
> -		zalloc_cpumask_var(&rcu_nocb_mask, GFP_KERNEL);
> +		if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&rcu_nocb_mask, GFP_KERNEL)) {
> +			pr_info("rcu_nocb_mask allocation failed\n");
> +			return;
> +		}
>  		have_rcu_nocb_mask = true;
>  	}
>  #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_ZERO
> @@ -66,17 +69,15 @@ static void __init rcu_bootup_announce_oddness_nocb(void)
>  	cpumask_copy(rcu_nocb_mask, cpu_possible_mask);
>  #endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_ALL */
>  #endif /* #ifndef CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_NONE */
> -	if (have_rcu_nocb_mask) {
> -		if (!cpumask_subset(rcu_nocb_mask, cpu_possible_mask)) {
> -			pr_info("\tNote: kernel parameter 'rcu_nocbs=' contains nonexistent CPUs.\n");
> -			cpumask_and(rcu_nocb_mask, cpu_possible_mask,
> -				    rcu_nocb_mask);
> -		}
> -		cpulist_scnprintf(nocb_buf, sizeof(nocb_buf), rcu_nocb_mask);
> -		pr_info("\tOffload RCU callbacks from CPUs: %s.\n", nocb_buf);
> -		if (rcu_nocb_poll)
> -			pr_info("\tPoll for callbacks from no-CBs CPUs.\n");
> +	if (!cpumask_subset(rcu_nocb_mask, cpu_possible_mask)) {

What happens if CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_NONE=y and the rcu_nocbs= boot
parameter is not specified and we get here?

In order to get visible failures when testing, build with
CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=y.

> +		pr_info("\tNote: kernel parameter 'rcu_nocbs=' contains nonexistent CPUs.\n");
> +		cpumask_and(rcu_nocb_mask, cpu_possible_mask,
> +				rcu_nocb_mask);
>  	}
> +	cpulist_scnprintf(nocb_buf, sizeof(nocb_buf), rcu_nocb_mask);
> +	pr_info("\tOffload RCU callbacks from CPUs: %s.\n", nocb_buf);
> +	if (rcu_nocb_poll)
> +		pr_info("\tPoll for callbacks from no-CBs CPUs.\n");
>  }
> 
>  /*
> -- 
> 2.0.1
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2014-07-25 15:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-07-25  0:37 [PATCH v2 1/2] rcu: Create a function for rcu_nocb_mask boot time setup Pranith Kumar
2014-07-25  0:37 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] rcu: Check the return value of rcu_nocb_mask cpumask allocation Pranith Kumar
2014-07-25 15:25   ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2014-07-25 18:06     ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-25 19:33       ` Pranith Kumar
2014-07-25 15:27 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] rcu: Create a function for rcu_nocb_mask boot time setup Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140725152551.GC11241@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=bobby.prani@gmail.com \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox