From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@gmail.com>
Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>,
"open list:READ-COPY UPDATE..." <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] rcu: Use rcu_gp_kthread_wake() to wake up kthreads
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2014 10:19:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140727171936.GQ11241@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53D2E861.2060000@gmail.com>
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 07:29:37PM -0400, Pranith Kumar wrote:
>
> On 07/25/2014 07:15 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 06:23:41PM -0400, Pranith Kumar wrote:
> >> Here total is the total number of times we enter th function rcu_report_qs_rsp()
> >> and unnecessary is the times we call wake_up() unnecessarily.
> >> case1, 2, 3 are the cases I listed above.
> >>
> >> Note that the frequency has gone way up than before, I am not sure why that is.
> >>
> >> *ALL* the wakeups seem to be unnecessary from that location. And the
> >> main reason is that gp_flags is 0.
> >>
> >> My rcugp file has the following:
> >>
> >> completed=257515 gpnum=257516 age=1 max=1684
> >>
> >> Thoughts?
> > Hard to believe in the rcutorture case. My guess was that rcutorture was
> > doing about 9000 wakeups, 2000 of which were unnecessary. Which would
> > of course still tilt things very much in favor of your patch.
> >
> > I am not surprised in the mostly-idle case, as the RCU grace-period
> > kthread would most likely be the one ending the grace period, which
> > would therefore almost always be a self-wakeup.
> >
> > Any chance of a peek at your debugging code?
>
> Sure, I am also attaching my dmesg output. Hope it helps!
Looks legit. I guess that having even one CPU idle for the duration
of the grace period will cause a self wakeup, so perhaps I should not
have been surprised.
In any case, please summarize the data down to no more than 30 lines of
text and resend your wakeup-elimination patch with this text included
as the change log.
Thanx, Paul
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-27 17:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-25 5:06 [RFC PATCH 1/1] rcu: Use rcu_gp_kthread_wake() to wake up kthreads Pranith Kumar
2014-07-25 6:24 ` Pranith Kumar
2014-07-25 15:02 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-25 22:23 ` Pranith Kumar
2014-07-25 23:15 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-25 23:29 ` Pranith Kumar
2014-07-27 17:19 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2014-07-25 14:44 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-25 20:19 ` Pranith Kumar
2014-07-25 22:47 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-27 15:55 ` Pranith Kumar
2014-07-27 16:29 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-27 16:44 ` Pranith Kumar
2014-07-27 17:16 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140727171936.GQ11241@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=bobby.prani@gmail.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox