From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
jhladky@redhat.com, ktkhai@parallels.com,
tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com,
Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] sched: fix and clean up calculate_imbalance
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 17:27:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140729152705.GX12054@laptop.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140729145910.GH3935@laptop>
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 04:59:10PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 11:04:50AM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> > > In situations where all the domains are overloaded, or where only the
> > > busiest domain is overloaded, that code is also superfluous, since
> > > the normal env->imbalance calculation will figure out how much to move.
> > > Remove the load_above_capacity calculation.
> >
> > IMHO, we should not remove that part which is used by prefer_sibling
> >
> > Originally, we had 2 type of busiest group: overloaded or imbalanced.
> > You add a new one which has only a avg_load higher than other so you
> > should handle this new case and keep the other ones unchanged
>
> Right, so we want that code for overloaded -> overloaded migrations such
> as not to cause idle cpus in an attempt to balance things. Idle cpus are
> worse than imbalance.
>
> But in case of overloaded/imb -> !overloaded migrations we can allow it,
> and in fact want to allow it in order to balance idle cpus.
Which would be patch 3/2
---
Subject: sched,fair: Allow calculate_imbalance() to move idle cpus
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: Tue Jul 29 17:15:11 CEST 2014
Allow calculate_imbalance() to 'create' idle cpus in the busiest group
if there are idle cpus in the local group.
Suggested-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-7k95k4i2tjv78iivstggiude@git.kernel.org
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 11 +++++------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -6273,12 +6273,11 @@ static inline void calculate_imbalance(s
return fix_small_imbalance(env, sds);
}
- if (busiest->group_type == group_overloaded) {
- /*
- * Don't want to pull so many tasks that a group would go idle.
- * Except of course for the group_imb case, since then we might
- * have to drop below capacity to reach cpu-load equilibrium.
- */
+ /*
+ * If there aren't any idle cpus, avoid creating some.
+ */
+ if (busiest->group_type == group_overloaded &&
+ local->group_type == group_overloaded) {
load_above_capacity =
(busiest->sum_nr_running - busiest->group_capacity_factor);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-29 15:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-28 18:16 [PATCH 0/2] load balancing fixes riel
2014-07-28 18:16 ` [PATCH 1/2] sched: fix and clean up calculate_imbalance riel
2014-07-29 9:04 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-07-29 14:53 ` Rik van Riel
2014-07-29 15:31 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-07-29 15:39 ` Rik van Riel
2014-07-29 14:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-29 15:15 ` Rik van Riel
2014-07-29 15:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-29 17:04 ` Rik van Riel
2014-07-29 15:27 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2014-07-30 9:32 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-07-30 10:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-12 14:52 ` [tip:sched/core] sched/fair: Allow calculate_imbalance() to move idle cpus tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-29 14:49 ` [PATCH 1/2] sched: fix and clean up calculate_imbalance Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-29 14:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-29 15:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-12 14:52 ` [tip:sched/core] sched/fair: Make calculate_imbalance() independent tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-28 18:16 ` [PATCH 2/2] sched: make update_sd_pick_busiest return true on a busier sd riel
2014-07-29 15:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-12 14:52 ` [tip:sched/core] sched/fair: Make update_sd_pick_busiest() return 'true' " tip-bot for Rik van Riel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140729152705.GX12054@laptop.lan \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=jhladky@redhat.com \
--cc=ktkhai@parallels.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mikey@neuling.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas.pitre@linaro.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox