[PATCH 3.14 10/29] s390/ptrace: fix PSW mask check

[Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

3.14-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>

commit dab6cf55f81a6e16b8147aed9a843e1691dcd318 upstream.

The PSW mask check of the PTRACE_POKEUSR_AREA command is incorrect.
The PSW_MASK_USER define contains the PSW_MASK_ASC bits, the ptrace
interface accepts all combinations for the address-space-control
bits. To protect the kernel space the PSW mask check in ptrace needs
to reject the address-space-control bit combination for home space.

Fixes CVE-2014-3534

Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 arch/s390/kernel/ptrace.c |   12 ++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/s390/kernel/ptrace.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/ptrace.c
@@ -323,9 +323,14 @@ static int __poke_user(struct task_struc
 			unsigned long mask = PSW_MASK_USER;
 
 			mask |= is_ri_task(child) ? PSW_MASK_RI : 0;
-			if ((data & ~mask) != PSW_USER_BITS)
+			if ((data ^ PSW_USER_BITS) & ~mask)
+				/* Invalid psw mask. */
+				return -EINVAL;
+			if ((data & PSW_MASK_ASC) == PSW_ASC_HOME)
+				/* Invalid address-space-control bits */
 				return -EINVAL;
 			if ((data & PSW_MASK_EA) && !(data & PSW_MASK_BA))
+				/* Invalid addressing mode bits */
 				return -EINVAL;
 		}
 		*(addr_t *)((addr_t) &task_pt_regs(child)->psw + addr) = data;
@@ -661,9 +666,12 @@ static int __poke_user_compat(struct tas
 
 			mask |= is_ri_task(child) ? PSW32_MASK_RI : 0;
 			/* Build a 64 bit psw mask from 31 bit mask. */
-			if ((tmp & ~mask) != PSW32_USER_BITS)
+			if ((tmp ^ PSW32_USER_BITS) & ~mask)
 				/* Invalid psw mask. */
 				return -EINVAL;
+			if ((data & PSW32_MASK_ASC) == PSW32_ASC_HOME)
+				/* Invalid address-space-control bits */
+				return -EINVAL;
 			regs->psw.mask = (regs->psw.mask & ~PSW_MASK_USER) |
 				(regs->psw.mask & PSW_MASK_BA) |
 				(__u64)(tmp & mask) << 32;