linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>,
	Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] x86: entry_64.S: always allocate complete "struct pt_regs"
Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2014 00:52:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140801225214.GA26491@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1406904498-21647-4-git-send-email-dvlasenk@redhat.com>

On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 04:48:17PM +0200, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> 64-bit code was using six stack slots fewer by not saving/restoring
> registers which a callee-preserved according to C ABI,
> and not allocating space for them.
> 
> Only when syscall needed a complete "struct pt_regs",
> the complete area was allocated and filled in.
> 
> This proved to be a source of significant obfuscation and subtle bugs.
> For example, stub_fork had to pop the return address,
> extend the struct, save registers, and push return address back. Ugly.
> ia32_ptregs_common pops return address and "returns" via jmp insn,
> throwing a wrench into CPU return stack cache.
> 
> This patch changes code to always allocate a complete "struct pt_regs".
> The saving of registers is still done lazily.
> 
> Macros which manipulate "struct pt_regs" on stack are reworked:
> ALLOC_PTREGS_ON_STACK allocates the structure.
> SAVE_C_REGS saves to it those registers which are clobbered by C code.
> SAVE_EXTRA_REGS saves to it all other registers.
> Corresponding RESTORE_* and REMOVE_PTREGS_FROM_STACK macros reverse it.
> 
> ia32_ptregs_common, stub_fork and friends lost their ugly dance with
> return pointer.
> 
> LOAD_ARGS32 in ia32entry.S now uses a symbolic stack offsets
> instead of magic numbers.
> 
> Misleading and slightly wrong comments in "struct pt_regs" are fixed
> (four instances).
> 
> Patch was run-tested: 64-bit executables, 32-bit executables,
> strace works.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
> CC: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
> CC: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
> CC: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
> CC: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
> CC: X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>
> CC: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
> CC: Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>
> CC: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> ---
>  arch/x86/ia32/ia32entry.S              |  47 +++----
>  arch/x86/include/asm/calling.h         | 224 ++++++++++++++++-----------------
>  arch/x86/include/asm/irqflags.h        |   4 +-
>  arch/x86/include/asm/ptrace.h          |  13 +-
>  arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/ptrace-abi.h |  16 ++-
>  arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/ptrace.h     |  13 +-
>  arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S             | 132 ++++++++-----------
>  arch/x86/kernel/preempt.S              |  16 ++-
>  8 files changed, 232 insertions(+), 233 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/ia32/ia32entry.S b/arch/x86/ia32/ia32entry.S
> index 4299eb0..ef9ee16 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/ia32/ia32entry.S
> +++ b/arch/x86/ia32/ia32entry.S
> @@ -62,12 +62,12 @@
>  	 */
>  	.macro LOAD_ARGS32 offset, _r9=0
>  	.if \_r9
> -	movl \offset+16(%rsp),%r9d
> +	movl \offset+R9(%rsp),%r9d
>  	.endif
> -	movl \offset+40(%rsp),%ecx
> -	movl \offset+48(%rsp),%edx
> -	movl \offset+56(%rsp),%esi
> -	movl \offset+64(%rsp),%edi
> +	movl \offset+RCX(%rsp),%ecx
> +	movl \offset+RDX(%rsp),%edx
> +	movl \offset+RSI(%rsp),%esi
> +	movl \offset+RDI(%rsp),%edi
>  	movl %eax,%eax			/* zero extension */
>  	.endm
>  	
> @@ -144,7 +144,8 @@ ENTRY(ia32_sysenter_target)
>  	CFI_REL_OFFSET rip,0
>  	pushq_cfi %rax
>  	cld
> -	SAVE_ARGS 0,1,0
> +	ALLOC_PTREGS_ON_STACK
> +	SAVE_C_REGS_EXCEPT_R891011
>   	/* no need to do an access_ok check here because rbp has been
>   	   32bit zero extended */ 
>  	ASM_STAC
> @@ -172,7 +173,8 @@ sysexit_from_sys_call:
>  	andl  $~0x200,EFLAGS-R11(%rsp) 
>  	movl	RIP-R11(%rsp),%edx		/* User %eip */
>  	CFI_REGISTER rip,rdx
> -	RESTORE_ARGS 0,24,0,0,0,0
> +	RESTORE_RSI_RDI

I heard there will be a v2 so I'll probably wait for it to review this patch
which really requires 0db where I sit.

But the macro names like above look much clearer as well!

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-08-01 22:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-08-01 14:48 [PATCH 1/5] x86: entry_64.S: delete unused code Denys Vlasenko
2014-08-01 14:48 ` [PATCH 2/5] x86: open-code register save/restore in trace_hardirqs thunks Denys Vlasenko
2014-08-01 14:48 ` [PATCH 3/5] x86: entry_64.S: fold SAVE_ARGS_IRQ macro into its sole user Denys Vlasenko
2014-08-01 18:30   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-08-01 14:48 ` [PATCH 4/5] x86: entry_64.S: always allocate complete "struct pt_regs" Denys Vlasenko
2014-08-01 17:04   ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-08-04 14:28     ` Denys Vlasenko
2014-08-04 14:47       ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-04 15:34         ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-04 21:03       ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-08-04 21:23         ` Borislav Petkov
2014-08-05 10:35         ` Denys Vlasenko
2014-08-05 14:53           ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-08-05 15:17             ` Denys Vlasenko
2014-08-05 23:02               ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-08-07  9:54             ` Denys Vlasenko
2014-08-01 18:09   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2014-08-01 18:30   ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-01 18:35   ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-08-01 22:11     ` Denys Vlasenko
2014-08-01 22:13       ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-08-02 21:14         ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-08-02 21:23           ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-08-02 21:38             ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-08-01 22:52   ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2014-08-01 23:19   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-08-04  3:03     ` Denys Vlasenko
2014-08-04  7:57       ` Borislav Petkov
2014-08-11  0:46       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-08-11  8:40         ` Jan Beulich
2014-08-11  9:07           ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-08-11  9:31             ` Jan Beulich
2014-08-11 13:26           ` Denys Vlasenko
2014-08-11 14:17             ` Jan Beulich
2014-08-11 14:53               ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-08-11 15:08                 ` Jan Beulich
2014-08-11 15:13                   ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-08-12  9:31                     ` Denys Vlasenko
2014-08-12  9:50                       ` Jan Beulich
2014-08-01 14:48 ` [PATCH 5/5] x86: mass removal of ARGOFFSET Denys Vlasenko
2014-08-01 18:00 ` [PATCH 1/5] x86: entry_64.S: delete unused code Frederic Weisbecker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140801225214.GA26491@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=ast@plumgrid.com \
    --cc=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=wad@chromium.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).