From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>,
Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] x86: entry_64.S: always allocate complete "struct pt_regs"
Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2014 00:52:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140801225214.GA26491@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1406904498-21647-4-git-send-email-dvlasenk@redhat.com>
On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 04:48:17PM +0200, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> 64-bit code was using six stack slots fewer by not saving/restoring
> registers which a callee-preserved according to C ABI,
> and not allocating space for them.
>
> Only when syscall needed a complete "struct pt_regs",
> the complete area was allocated and filled in.
>
> This proved to be a source of significant obfuscation and subtle bugs.
> For example, stub_fork had to pop the return address,
> extend the struct, save registers, and push return address back. Ugly.
> ia32_ptregs_common pops return address and "returns" via jmp insn,
> throwing a wrench into CPU return stack cache.
>
> This patch changes code to always allocate a complete "struct pt_regs".
> The saving of registers is still done lazily.
>
> Macros which manipulate "struct pt_regs" on stack are reworked:
> ALLOC_PTREGS_ON_STACK allocates the structure.
> SAVE_C_REGS saves to it those registers which are clobbered by C code.
> SAVE_EXTRA_REGS saves to it all other registers.
> Corresponding RESTORE_* and REMOVE_PTREGS_FROM_STACK macros reverse it.
>
> ia32_ptregs_common, stub_fork and friends lost their ugly dance with
> return pointer.
>
> LOAD_ARGS32 in ia32entry.S now uses a symbolic stack offsets
> instead of magic numbers.
>
> Misleading and slightly wrong comments in "struct pt_regs" are fixed
> (four instances).
>
> Patch was run-tested: 64-bit executables, 32-bit executables,
> strace works.
>
> Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
> CC: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
> CC: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
> CC: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
> CC: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
> CC: X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>
> CC: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
> CC: Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>
> CC: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> ---
> arch/x86/ia32/ia32entry.S | 47 +++----
> arch/x86/include/asm/calling.h | 224 ++++++++++++++++-----------------
> arch/x86/include/asm/irqflags.h | 4 +-
> arch/x86/include/asm/ptrace.h | 13 +-
> arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/ptrace-abi.h | 16 ++-
> arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/ptrace.h | 13 +-
> arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S | 132 ++++++++-----------
> arch/x86/kernel/preempt.S | 16 ++-
> 8 files changed, 232 insertions(+), 233 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/ia32/ia32entry.S b/arch/x86/ia32/ia32entry.S
> index 4299eb0..ef9ee16 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/ia32/ia32entry.S
> +++ b/arch/x86/ia32/ia32entry.S
> @@ -62,12 +62,12 @@
> */
> .macro LOAD_ARGS32 offset, _r9=0
> .if \_r9
> - movl \offset+16(%rsp),%r9d
> + movl \offset+R9(%rsp),%r9d
> .endif
> - movl \offset+40(%rsp),%ecx
> - movl \offset+48(%rsp),%edx
> - movl \offset+56(%rsp),%esi
> - movl \offset+64(%rsp),%edi
> + movl \offset+RCX(%rsp),%ecx
> + movl \offset+RDX(%rsp),%edx
> + movl \offset+RSI(%rsp),%esi
> + movl \offset+RDI(%rsp),%edi
> movl %eax,%eax /* zero extension */
> .endm
>
> @@ -144,7 +144,8 @@ ENTRY(ia32_sysenter_target)
> CFI_REL_OFFSET rip,0
> pushq_cfi %rax
> cld
> - SAVE_ARGS 0,1,0
> + ALLOC_PTREGS_ON_STACK
> + SAVE_C_REGS_EXCEPT_R891011
> /* no need to do an access_ok check here because rbp has been
> 32bit zero extended */
> ASM_STAC
> @@ -172,7 +173,8 @@ sysexit_from_sys_call:
> andl $~0x200,EFLAGS-R11(%rsp)
> movl RIP-R11(%rsp),%edx /* User %eip */
> CFI_REGISTER rip,rdx
> - RESTORE_ARGS 0,24,0,0,0,0
> + RESTORE_RSI_RDI
I heard there will be a v2 so I'll probably wait for it to review this patch
which really requires 0db where I sit.
But the macro names like above look much clearer as well!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-01 22:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-01 14:48 [PATCH 1/5] x86: entry_64.S: delete unused code Denys Vlasenko
2014-08-01 14:48 ` [PATCH 2/5] x86: open-code register save/restore in trace_hardirqs thunks Denys Vlasenko
2014-08-01 14:48 ` [PATCH 3/5] x86: entry_64.S: fold SAVE_ARGS_IRQ macro into its sole user Denys Vlasenko
2014-08-01 18:30 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-08-01 14:48 ` [PATCH 4/5] x86: entry_64.S: always allocate complete "struct pt_regs" Denys Vlasenko
2014-08-01 17:04 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-08-04 14:28 ` Denys Vlasenko
2014-08-04 14:47 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-04 15:34 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-04 21:03 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-08-04 21:23 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-08-05 10:35 ` Denys Vlasenko
2014-08-05 14:53 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-08-05 15:17 ` Denys Vlasenko
2014-08-05 23:02 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-08-07 9:54 ` Denys Vlasenko
2014-08-01 18:09 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2014-08-01 18:30 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-01 18:35 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-08-01 22:11 ` Denys Vlasenko
2014-08-01 22:13 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-08-02 21:14 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-08-02 21:23 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-08-02 21:38 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-08-01 22:52 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2014-08-01 23:19 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-08-04 3:03 ` Denys Vlasenko
2014-08-04 7:57 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-08-11 0:46 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-08-11 8:40 ` Jan Beulich
2014-08-11 9:07 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-08-11 9:31 ` Jan Beulich
2014-08-11 13:26 ` Denys Vlasenko
2014-08-11 14:17 ` Jan Beulich
2014-08-11 14:53 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-08-11 15:08 ` Jan Beulich
2014-08-11 15:13 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-08-12 9:31 ` Denys Vlasenko
2014-08-12 9:50 ` Jan Beulich
2014-08-01 14:48 ` [PATCH 5/5] x86: mass removal of ARGOFFSET Denys Vlasenko
2014-08-01 18:00 ` [PATCH 1/5] x86: entry_64.S: delete unused code Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140801225214.GA26491@localhost.localdomain \
--to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=ast@plumgrid.com \
--cc=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=wad@chromium.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).