linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com>,
	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/5] fs/proc/task_mmu.c: unify/simplify do_maps_open() and numa_maps_open()
Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2014 23:19:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140803211933.GC13330@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140803211843.GA13330@redhat.com>

do_maps_open() and numa_maps_open() are overcomplicated, they could
use __seq_open_private(). Plus they do the same, just sizeof(*priv)
differs.

Change them to use a new simple helper, proc_maps_open(ops, psize).
This simplifies the code and allows us to do the next changes.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
---
 fs/proc/task_mmu.c |   44 ++++++++++++++++----------------------------
 1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
index 8a5271e..794aeb6 100644
--- a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
+++ b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
@@ -231,23 +231,23 @@ static void m_stop(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
 		put_task_struct(priv->task);
 }
 
+static int proc_maps_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file,
+			const struct seq_operations *ops, int psize)
+{
+	struct proc_maps_private *priv = __seq_open_private(file, ops, psize);
+
+	if (!priv)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	priv->pid = proc_pid(inode);
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int do_maps_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file,
 			const struct seq_operations *ops)
 {
-	struct proc_maps_private *priv;
-	int ret = -ENOMEM;
-	priv = kzalloc(sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (priv) {
-		priv->pid = proc_pid(inode);
-		ret = seq_open(file, ops);
-		if (!ret) {
-			struct seq_file *m = file->private_data;
-			m->private = priv;
-		} else {
-			kfree(priv);
-		}
-	}
-	return ret;
+	return proc_maps_open(inode, file, ops,
+				sizeof(struct proc_maps_private));
 }
 
 static void
@@ -1502,20 +1502,8 @@ static const struct seq_operations proc_tid_numa_maps_op = {
 static int numa_maps_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file,
 			  const struct seq_operations *ops)
 {
-	struct numa_maps_private *priv;
-	int ret = -ENOMEM;
-	priv = kzalloc(sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (priv) {
-		priv->proc_maps.pid = proc_pid(inode);
-		ret = seq_open(file, ops);
-		if (!ret) {
-			struct seq_file *m = file->private_data;
-			m->private = priv;
-		} else {
-			kfree(priv);
-		}
-	}
-	return ret;
+	return proc_maps_open(inode, file, ops,
+				sizeof(struct numa_maps_private));
 }
 
 static int pid_numa_maps_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
-- 
1.5.5.1



  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-08-03 21:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-08-02 20:10 [PATCH, RESEND] procfs: silence lockdep warning about read vs. exec seq_file Kirill A. Shutemov
2014-08-03 16:44 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-03 21:18   ` [PATCH 0/5] (Was: procfs: silence lockdep warning about read vs. exec seq_file) Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-03 21:19     ` [PATCH 1/5] fs/proc/task_mmu.c: don't use task->mm in m_start() and show_*map() Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-03 21:19     ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2014-08-03 21:20     ` [PATCH 3/5] proc: introduce proc_mem_open() Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-03 21:20     ` [PATCH 4/5] fs/proc/task_mmu.c: introduce the "stable" proc_maps_private->mm Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-03 21:20     ` [PATCH 5/5] fs/proc/task_mmu.c: change m_start() to rely on priv->mm and avoid mm_access() Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-04  6:59     ` [PATCH 0/5] (Was: procfs: silence lockdep warning about read vs. exec seq_file) Cyrill Gorcunov
2014-08-04  9:20     ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2014-08-04 14:55       ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-05  3:42 ` [PATCH, RESEND] procfs: silence lockdep warning about read vs. exec seq_file Eric W. Biederman
2014-08-05  8:46   ` Kirill A. Shutemov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140803211933.GC13330@redhat.com \
    --to=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=gorcunov@openvz.org \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
    --cc=levinsasha928@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).