From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: mingo@kernel.org, oleg@redhat.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, ilya.dryomov@inktank.com,
umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Eric Paris <eparis@parisplace.org>,
John McCutchan <john@johnmccutchan.com>,
Robert Love <rlove@rlove.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 1/7] wait: Provide infrastructure to deal with nested blocking
Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2014 12:30:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140804103537.356311360@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20140804103025.478913141@infradead.org
[-- Attachment #1: peterz-wait-nested.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 2745 bytes --]
There are a few places that call blocking primitives from wait loops,
provide infrastructure to support this without the typical
task_struct::state collision.
We record the wakeup in wait_queue_t::flags which leaves
task_struct::state free to be used by others.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
---
include/linux/wait.h | 7 ++++++-
kernel/sched/wait.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/include/linux/wait.h
+++ b/include/linux/wait.h
@@ -13,9 +13,12 @@ typedef struct __wait_queue wait_queue_t
typedef int (*wait_queue_func_t)(wait_queue_t *wait, unsigned mode, int flags, void *key);
int default_wake_function(wait_queue_t *wait, unsigned mode, int flags, void *key);
+/* __wait_queue::flags */
+#define WQ_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE 0x01
+#define WQ_FLAG_WOKEN 0x02
+
struct __wait_queue {
unsigned int flags;
-#define WQ_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE 0x01
void *private;
wait_queue_func_t func;
struct list_head task_list;
@@ -825,6 +828,8 @@ void prepare_to_wait_exclusive(wait_queu
long prepare_to_wait_event(wait_queue_head_t *q, wait_queue_t *wait, int state);
void finish_wait(wait_queue_head_t *q, wait_queue_t *wait);
void abort_exclusive_wait(wait_queue_head_t *q, wait_queue_t *wait, unsigned int mode, void *key);
+long wait_woken(wait_queue_t *wait, unsigned mode, long timeout);
+int woken_wake_function(wait_queue_t *wait, unsigned mode, int sync, void *key);
int autoremove_wake_function(wait_queue_t *wait, unsigned mode, int sync, void *key);
int wake_bit_function(wait_queue_t *wait, unsigned mode, int sync, void *key);
--- a/kernel/sched/wait.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/wait.c
@@ -297,6 +297,35 @@ int autoremove_wake_function(wait_queue_
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(autoremove_wake_function);
+long wait_woken(wait_queue_t *wait, unsigned mode, long timeout)
+{
+ set_current_state(mode);
+ if (!(wait->flags & WQ_FLAG_WOKEN))
+ timeout = schedule_timeout(timeout);
+ else
+ wait->flags &= ~WQ_FLAG_WOKEN;
+ __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
+
+ return timeout;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(wait_woken);
+
+int woken_wake_function(wait_queue_t *wait, unsigned mode, int sync, void *key)
+{
+ /*
+ * Although this function is called under waitqueue lock, LOCK
+ * doesn't imply write barrier and the users expect write
+ * barrier semantics on wakeup functions. The following
+ * smp_wmb() is equivalent to smp_wmb() in try_to_wake_up()
+ * and is paired with set_mb() in wait_woken().
+ */
+ smp_wmb();
+ wait->flags |= WQ_FLAG_WOKEN;
+
+ return default_wake_function(wait, mode, sync, key);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(woken_wake_function);
+
int wake_bit_function(wait_queue_t *wait, unsigned mode, int sync, void *arg)
{
struct wait_bit_key *key = arg;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-04 10:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-04 10:30 [RFC][PATCH 0/7] nested sleeps, fixes and debug infra Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-04 10:30 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2014-08-04 13:44 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/7] wait: Provide infrastructure to deal with nested blocking Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-04 18:35 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-04 10:30 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/7] wait: Provide Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-04 10:30 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/7] exit: Desl with nested sleeps Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-04 18:53 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-04 10:30 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/7] inotify: Deal " Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-04 19:23 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-04 21:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-05 2:22 ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-08-05 7:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-04 10:30 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/7] tty: " Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-05 23:29 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2014-08-04 10:30 ` [RFC][PATCH 6/7] smp: Correctly deal " Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-04 10:30 ` [RFC][PATCH 7/7] sched: Debug " Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-05 8:33 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/7] nested sleeps, fixes and debug infra Ilya Dryomov
2014-08-05 13:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-06 7:51 ` Ilya Dryomov
2014-08-06 8:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-06 21:16 ` David Miller
2014-08-07 8:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140804103537.356311360@infradead.org \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=eparis@parisplace.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=ilya.dryomov@inktank.com \
--cc=john@johnmccutchan.com \
--cc=jslaby@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=rlove@rlove.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).