From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: mingo@kernel.org, oleg@redhat.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, ilya.dryomov@inktank.com,
umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 2/7] wait: Provide
Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2014 12:30:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140804103537.426757643@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20140804103025.478913141@infradead.org
[-- Attachment #1: peterz-wait-might_sleep.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 4661 bytes --]
Add more might_sleep() checks, suppose someone put a wait_event() like
thing in a wait loop..
Can't put might_sleep() in ___wait_event() because there's the locked
primitives which call ___wait_event() with locks held.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
---
include/linux/wait.h | 16 ++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
--- a/include/linux/wait.h
+++ b/include/linux/wait.h
@@ -272,6 +272,7 @@ __out: __ret; \
*/
#define wait_event(wq, condition) \
do { \
+ might_sleep(); \
if (condition) \
break; \
__wait_event(wq, condition); \
@@ -302,6 +303,7 @@ do { \
#define wait_event_timeout(wq, condition, timeout) \
({ \
long __ret = timeout; \
+ might_sleep(); \
if (!___wait_cond_timeout(condition)) \
__ret = __wait_event_timeout(wq, condition, timeout); \
__ret; \
@@ -327,6 +329,7 @@ do { \
*/
#define wait_event_cmd(wq, condition, cmd1, cmd2) \
do { \
+ might_sleep(); \
if (condition) \
break; \
__wait_event_cmd(wq, condition, cmd1, cmd2); \
@@ -354,6 +357,7 @@ do { \
#define wait_event_interruptible(wq, condition) \
({ \
int __ret = 0; \
+ might_sleep(); \
if (!(condition)) \
__ret = __wait_event_interruptible(wq, condition); \
__ret; \
@@ -385,6 +389,7 @@ do { \
#define wait_event_interruptible_timeout(wq, condition, timeout) \
({ \
long __ret = timeout; \
+ might_sleep(); \
if (!___wait_cond_timeout(condition)) \
__ret = __wait_event_interruptible_timeout(wq, \
condition, timeout); \
@@ -435,6 +440,7 @@ do { \
#define wait_event_hrtimeout(wq, condition, timeout) \
({ \
int __ret = 0; \
+ might_sleep(); \
if (!(condition)) \
__ret = __wait_event_hrtimeout(wq, condition, timeout, \
TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE); \
@@ -460,6 +466,7 @@ do { \
#define wait_event_interruptible_hrtimeout(wq, condition, timeout) \
({ \
long __ret = 0; \
+ might_sleep(); \
if (!(condition)) \
__ret = __wait_event_hrtimeout(wq, condition, timeout, \
TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE); \
@@ -473,6 +480,7 @@ do { \
#define wait_event_interruptible_exclusive(wq, condition) \
({ \
int __ret = 0; \
+ might_sleep(); \
if (!(condition)) \
__ret = __wait_event_interruptible_exclusive(wq, condition);\
__ret; \
@@ -647,6 +655,7 @@ do { \
#define wait_event_killable(wq, condition) \
({ \
int __ret = 0; \
+ might_sleep(); \
if (!(condition)) \
__ret = __wait_event_killable(wq, condition); \
__ret; \
@@ -895,6 +904,7 @@ extern int bit_wait_io(struct wait_bit_k
static inline int
wait_on_bit(void *word, int bit, unsigned mode)
{
+ might_sleep();
if (!test_bit(bit, word))
return 0;
return out_of_line_wait_on_bit(word, bit,
@@ -919,6 +929,7 @@ wait_on_bit(void *word, int bit, unsigne
static inline int
wait_on_bit_io(void *word, int bit, unsigned mode)
{
+ might_sleep();
if (!test_bit(bit, word))
return 0;
return out_of_line_wait_on_bit(word, bit,
@@ -945,6 +956,7 @@ wait_on_bit_io(void *word, int bit, unsi
static inline int
wait_on_bit_action(void *word, int bit, wait_bit_action_f *action, unsigned mode)
{
+ might_sleep();
if (!test_bit(bit, word))
return 0;
return out_of_line_wait_on_bit(word, bit, action, mode);
@@ -972,6 +984,7 @@ wait_on_bit_action(void *word, int bit,
static inline int
wait_on_bit_lock(void *word, int bit, unsigned mode)
{
+ might_sleep();
if (!test_and_set_bit(bit, word))
return 0;
return out_of_line_wait_on_bit_lock(word, bit, bit_wait, mode);
@@ -995,6 +1008,7 @@ wait_on_bit_lock(void *word, int bit, un
static inline int
wait_on_bit_lock_io(void *word, int bit, unsigned mode)
{
+ might_sleep();
if (!test_and_set_bit(bit, word))
return 0;
return out_of_line_wait_on_bit_lock(word, bit, bit_wait_io, mode);
@@ -1020,6 +1034,7 @@ wait_on_bit_lock_io(void *word, int bit,
static inline int
wait_on_bit_lock_action(void *word, int bit, wait_bit_action_f *action, unsigned mode)
{
+ might_sleep();
if (!test_and_set_bit(bit, word))
return 0;
return out_of_line_wait_on_bit_lock(word, bit, action, mode);
@@ -1038,6 +1053,7 @@ wait_on_bit_lock_action(void *word, int
static inline
int wait_on_atomic_t(atomic_t *val, int (*action)(atomic_t *), unsigned mode)
{
+ might_sleep();
if (atomic_read(val) == 0)
return 0;
return out_of_line_wait_on_atomic_t(val, action, mode);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-04 10:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-04 10:30 [RFC][PATCH 0/7] nested sleeps, fixes and debug infra Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-04 10:30 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/7] wait: Provide infrastructure to deal with nested blocking Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-04 13:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-04 18:35 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-04 10:30 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2014-08-04 10:30 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/7] exit: Desl with nested sleeps Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-04 18:53 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-04 10:30 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/7] inotify: Deal " Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-04 19:23 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-04 21:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-05 2:22 ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-08-05 7:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-04 10:30 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/7] tty: " Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-05 23:29 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2014-08-04 10:30 ` [RFC][PATCH 6/7] smp: Correctly deal " Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-04 10:30 ` [RFC][PATCH 7/7] sched: Debug " Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-05 8:33 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/7] nested sleeps, fixes and debug infra Ilya Dryomov
2014-08-05 13:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-06 7:51 ` Ilya Dryomov
2014-08-06 8:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-06 21:16 ` David Miller
2014-08-07 8:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140804103537.426757643@infradead.org \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ilya.dryomov@inktank.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).