From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752135AbaHDLeH (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Aug 2014 07:34:07 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:56198 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751630AbaHDLeF (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Aug 2014 07:34:05 -0400 Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2014 04:34:04 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Christoph Hellwig , James Bottomley , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] scsi patch queue tree updated Message-ID: <20140804113404.GA11377@infradead.org> References: <20140708134003.GA7790@infradead.org> <20140801122042.GA10771@infradead.org> <1406925121.2654.21.camel@jarvis> <20140804111147.GA29148@infradead.org> <20140804213059.32fd25d5@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140804213059.32fd25d5@canb.auug.org.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 09:30:59PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > You realise that neither of these in linux-next as the scsi-core and > scsi-drivers trees had for-3.16 branches in the last round. I assume I > should just drop these trees completely from linux-next? Well, they get pulled in through James, so you can drop them for now. I mostly put you on Cc so you could comment wether there are any hard rules on how long even those simple fixes should be in linux-next. I know you've put up stats for a few of the last merge windows about patches that weren't in linux-next, so there's been some tracking of it for sure.