linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org,
	dipankar@in.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, josh@joshtriplett.org,
	tglx@linutronix.de, rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com,
	edumazet@google.com, dvhart@linux.intel.com, fweisbec@gmail.com,
	oleg@redhat.com, bobby.prani@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 tip/core/rcu 1/9] rcu: Add call_rcu_tasks()
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2014 17:51:02 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140806005101.GW8101@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53E177D9.2090105@cn.fujitsu.com>

On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 08:33:29AM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> On 08/06/2014 05:55 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 05, 2014 at 08:47:55AM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> >> On 08/04/2014 10:56 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 02:25:15PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >>>> On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 04:50:44AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >>>>> OK, I will bite...
> >>>>>
> >>>>> What kinds of tasks are on a runqueue, but neither ->on_cpu nor
> >>>>> PREEMPT_ACTIVE?
> >>>>
> >>>> Userspace tasks, they don't necessarily get PREEMPT_ACTIVE when
> >>>> preempted. Now obviously you're not _that_ interested in userspace tasks
> >>>> for this, so that might be ok.
> >>>>
> >>>> But the main point was, you cannot use ->on_cpu or PREEMPT_ACTIVE
> >>>> without holding rq->lock.
> >>>
> >>> Hmm, maybe you can, we have the context switch in between setting
> >>> ->on_cpu and clearing PREEMPT_ACTIVE and vice-versa.
> >>>
> >>> The context switch (obviously) provides a full barrier, so we might be
> >>> able to -- with careful consideration -- read these two separate values
> >>> and construct something usable from them.
> >>>
> >>> Something like:
> >>>
> >>> 	task_preempt_count(tsk) & PREEMPT_ACTIVE
> >> 	the @tsk is running on_cpu, the above result is false.
> >>> 	smp_rmb();
> >>> 	tsk->on_cpu
> >> 	now the @tsk is preempted, the above result also is false.
> >>
> >> 	so it is useless if we fetch the preempt_count and on_cpu in two separated
> >> instructions.  Maybe it would work if we also take tsk->nivcsw in consideration.
> >> (I just noticed that tsk->n[i]vcsw are the version numbers for the tsk->on_cpu)
> >>
> >> bool task_on_cpu_or_preempted(tsk)
> >> {
> >> 	unsigned long saved_nivcsw;
> >>
> >> 	saved_nivcsw = task->nivcsw;
> >> 	if (tsk->on_cpu)
> >> 		return true;
> >>
> >> 	smp_rmb();
> >>
> >> 	if (task_preempt_count(tsk) & PREEMPT_ACTIVE)
> >> 		return true;
> >>
> >> 	smp_rmb();
> >>
> >> 	if (tsk->on_cpu || task->nivcsw != saved_nivcsw)
> >> 		return true;
> >>
> >> 	return false;
> >> }
> >>
> >>>
> >>> And because we set PREEMPT_ACTIVE before clearing on_cpu, this should
> >>> race the right way (err towards the inclusive side).
> >>>
> >>> Obviously that wants a big fat comment...
> > 
> > How about the following?  Non-nohz_full userspace tasks are already covered
> > courtesy of scheduling-clock interrupts, and this handles nohz_full usermode
> > tasks.
> > 
> > Thoughts?
> > 
> > 							Thanx, Paul
> > 
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > 
> > rcu: Make TASKS_RCU handle nohx_full= CPUs
> > 
> > Currently TASKS_RCU would ignore a CPU running a task in nohz_full=
> > usermode execution.  There would be neither a context switch nor a
> > scheduling-clock interrupt to tell TASKS_RCU that the task in question
> > had passed through a quiescent state.  The grace period would therefore
> > extend indefinitely.  This commit therefore makes RCU's dyntick-idle
> > subsystem record the task_struct structure of the task that is running
> > in dyntick-idle mode on each CPU.  The TASKS_RCU grace period can
> > then access this information and record a quiescent state on
> > behalf of any CPU running in dyntick-idle usermode.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> > index f504f797c9c8..777aac3a34c0 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> > @@ -1140,5 +1140,14 @@ static inline void rcu_sysidle_force_exit(void)
> >  
> >  #endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL_SYSIDLE */
> >  
> > +#if defined(CONFIG_TASKS_RCU) && defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL)
> > +struct task_struct *rcu_dynticks_task_cur(int cpu);
> > +#else /* #if defined(CONFIG_TASKS_RCU) && defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL) */
> > +static inline struct task_struct *rcu_dynticks_task_cur(int cpu)
> > +{
> > +	return NULL;
> > +}
> > +#endif /* #else #if defined(CONFIG_TASKS_RCU) && defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL) */
> > +
> >  
> >  #endif /* __LINUX_RCUPDATE_H */
> > diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> > index 645a33efc0d4..86a0a7d5bbbd 100644
> > --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> > +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> > @@ -526,6 +526,7 @@ static void rcu_eqs_enter_common(struct rcu_dynticks *rdtp, long long oldval,
> >  	atomic_inc(&rdtp->dynticks);
> >  	smp_mb__after_atomic();  /* Force ordering with next sojourn. */
> >  	WARN_ON_ONCE(atomic_read(&rdtp->dynticks) & 0x1);
> > +	rcu_dynticks_task_enter(rdtp, current);
> >  
> >  	/*
> >  	 * It is illegal to enter an extended quiescent state while
> > @@ -642,6 +643,7 @@ void rcu_irq_exit(void)
> >  static void rcu_eqs_exit_common(struct rcu_dynticks *rdtp, long long oldval,
> >  			       int user)
> >  {
> > +	rcu_dynticks_task_exit(rdtp);
> 
> What happen when the trampoline happens before rcu_eqs_exit_common()?
> synchronize_sched() also skip this CPUs.  I think, for all CPUs,  only
> real schedule is reliable.

True, this prohibits tracing the point from the call to
rcu_eqs_enter_common() to the transition to usermode.  I am betting that
this is OK, though.

							Thanx, Paul

> >  	smp_mb__before_atomic();  /* Force ordering w/previous sojourn. */
> >  	atomic_inc(&rdtp->dynticks);
> >  	/* CPUs seeing atomic_inc() must see later RCU read-side crit sects */
> > diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.h b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
> > index 0f69a79c5b7d..1e79fa1b7cbf 100644
> > --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.h
> > +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
> > @@ -88,6 +88,9 @@ struct rcu_dynticks {
> >  				    /* Process level is worth LLONG_MAX/2. */
> >  	int dynticks_nmi_nesting;   /* Track NMI nesting level. */
> >  	atomic_t dynticks;	    /* Even value for idle, else odd. */
> > +#if defined(CONFIG_TASKS_RCU) && defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL)
> > +	struct task_struct *dynticks_tsk;
> > +#endif /* #if defined(CONFIG_TASKS_RCU) && defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL) */
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL_SYSIDLE
> >  	long long dynticks_idle_nesting;
> >  				    /* irq/process nesting level from idle. */
> > @@ -579,6 +582,9 @@ static void rcu_sysidle_report_gp(struct rcu_state *rsp, int isidle,
> >  static void rcu_bind_gp_kthread(void);
> >  static void rcu_sysidle_init_percpu_data(struct rcu_dynticks *rdtp);
> >  static bool rcu_nohz_full_cpu(struct rcu_state *rsp);
> > +static void rcu_dynticks_task_enter(struct rcu_dynticks *rdtp,
> > +				    struct task_struct *t);
> > +static void rcu_dynticks_task_exit(struct rcu_dynticks *rdtp);
> >  
> >  #endif /* #ifndef RCU_TREE_NONCORE */
> >  
> > diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
> > index a86a363ea453..442d62edc564 100644
> > --- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
> > +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
> > @@ -2852,3 +2852,29 @@ static void rcu_bind_gp_kthread(void)
> >  		set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, cpumask_of(cpu));
> >  #endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL */
> >  }
> > +
> > +/* Record the current task on dyntick-idle entry. */
> > +static void rcu_dynticks_task_enter(struct rcu_dynticks *rdtp,
> > +				    struct task_struct *t)
> > +{
> > +#if defined(CONFIG_TASKS_RCU) && defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL)
> > +	ACCESS_ONCE(rdtp->dynticks_tsk) = t;
> > +#endif /* #if defined(CONFIG_TASKS_RCU) && defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL) */
> > +}
> > +
> > +/* Record no current task on dyntick-idle exit. */
> > +static void rcu_dynticks_task_exit(struct rcu_dynticks *rdtp)
> > +{
> > +	rcu_dynticks_task_enter(rdtp, NULL);
> > +}
> > +
> > +#if defined(CONFIG_TASKS_RCU) && defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL)
> > +struct task_struct *rcu_dynticks_task_cur(int cpu)
> > +{
> > +	struct rcu_dynticks *rdtp = &per_cpu(rcu_dynticks, cpu);
> > +	struct task_struct *t = ACCESS_ONCE(rdtp->dynticks_tsk);
> > +
> > +	smp_read_barrier_depends(); /* Dereferences after fetch of "t". */
> > +	return t;
> > +}
> > +#endif /* #if defined(CONFIG_TASKS_RCU) && defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL) */
> > diff --git a/kernel/rcu/update.c b/kernel/rcu/update.c
> > index ad2a8df43757..6ad6af2ab028 100644
> > --- a/kernel/rcu/update.c
> > +++ b/kernel/rcu/update.c
> > @@ -481,6 +481,28 @@ static void check_holdout_task(struct task_struct *t,
> >  	sched_show_task(current);
> >  }
> >  
> > +/* Check for nohz_full CPUs executing in userspace. */
> > +static void check_no_hz_full_tasks(void)
> > +{
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL
> > +	int cpu;
> > +	struct task_struct *t;
> > +
> > +	for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
> > +		cond_resched();
> > +		rcu_read_lock();
> > +		t = rcu_dynticks_task_cur(cpu);
> > +		if (t == NULL || is_idle_task(t)) {
> > +			rcu_read_unlock();
> > +			continue;
> > +		}
> > +		if (ACCESS_ONCE(t->rcu_tasks_holdout))
> > +			ACCESS_ONCE(t->rcu_tasks_holdout) = 0;
> > +		rcu_read_unlock();
> > +	}
> > +#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL */
> > +}
> > +
> >  /* RCU-tasks kthread that detects grace periods and invokes callbacks. */
> >  static int __noreturn rcu_tasks_kthread(void *arg)
> >  {
> > @@ -584,6 +606,7 @@ static int __noreturn rcu_tasks_kthread(void *arg)
> >  				lastreport = jiffies;
> >  			firstreport = true;
> >  			WARN_ON(signal_pending(current));
> > +			check_no_hz_full_tasks();
> >  			rcu_read_lock();
> >  			list_for_each_entry_rcu(t, &rcu_tasks_holdouts,
> >  						rcu_tasks_holdout_list)
> > 
> > .
> > 
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2014-08-06  0:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 122+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-07-31 21:54 [PATCH v3 tip/core/rcu 0/9 Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-31 21:55 ` [PATCH v3 tip/core/rcu 1/9] rcu: Add call_rcu_tasks() Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-31 21:55   ` [PATCH v3 tip/core/rcu 2/9] rcu: Provide cond_resched_rcu_qs() to force quiescent states in long loops Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-31 21:55   ` [PATCH v3 tip/core/rcu 3/9] rcu: Add synchronous grace-period waiting for RCU-tasks Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-01 15:09     ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-01 18:32       ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-01 19:44         ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-02 14:47           ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-02 22:58             ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-06  0:57               ` Steven Rostedt
2014-08-06  1:21                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-06  8:47                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-06 12:09                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-06 16:30                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-06 22:45                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-07  8:45                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-07 15:00                             ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-07 15:26                               ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-07 17:27                                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-07 18:46                                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-07 19:49                                     ` Steven Rostedt
2014-08-07 19:53                                       ` Steven Rostedt
2014-08-07 20:08                                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-07 21:18                                           ` Steven Rostedt
2014-08-08  6:40                                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-08 14:12                                               ` Steven Rostedt
2014-08-08 14:28                                                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-09 10:56                                                   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-08-08 14:34                                                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-08 14:58                                                   ` Steven Rostedt
2014-08-08 15:16                                                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-08 15:39                                                       ` Steven Rostedt
2014-08-08 16:01                                                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-08 16:10                                                           ` Steven Rostedt
2014-08-08 16:17                                                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-08 16:40                                                           ` Steven Rostedt
2014-08-08 16:52                                                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-08 16:27                                                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-08 16:39                                                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-08 16:49                                                         ` Steven Rostedt
2014-08-08 16:51                                                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-08 17:09                                                           ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-08 16:43                                                       ` Steven Rostedt
2014-08-08 16:50                                                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-08 17:27                                                       ` Steven Rostedt
2014-08-09 10:36                                                         ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-08-07 20:06                                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-31 21:55   ` [PATCH v3 tip/core/rcu 4/9] rcu: Export RCU-tasks APIs to GPL modules Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-31 21:55   ` [PATCH v3 tip/core/rcu 5/9] rcutorture: Add torture tests for RCU-tasks Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-31 21:55   ` [PATCH v3 tip/core/rcu 6/9] rcutorture: Add RCU-tasks test cases Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-31 21:55   ` [PATCH v3 tip/core/rcu 7/9] rcu: Add stall-warning checks for RCU-tasks Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-31 21:55   ` [PATCH v3 tip/core/rcu 8/9] rcu: Improve RCU-tasks energy efficiency Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-31 21:55   ` [PATCH v3 tip/core/rcu 9/9] documentation: Add verbiage on RCU-tasks stall warning messages Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-31 23:57   ` [PATCH v3 tip/core/rcu 1/9] rcu: Add call_rcu_tasks() Frederic Weisbecker
2014-08-01  2:04     ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-01 15:06       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-08-01  1:15   ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-08-01  1:59     ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-01  1:31   ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-08-01  2:11     ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-01 14:11   ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-01 18:28     ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-01 18:40       ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-02 23:00         ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-03 12:57           ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-03 22:03             ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-04 13:29               ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-04 13:48                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-01 18:57   ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-02 22:50     ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-02 14:56   ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-02 22:57     ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-03 13:33       ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-03 22:05         ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-04  0:37           ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-08-04  1:09             ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-04 13:25               ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-04 13:51                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-04 13:52                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-04 13:32           ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-04 19:28             ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-04 19:32               ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-04  1:28   ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-08-04  7:46     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-04  8:18       ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-08-04 11:50         ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-04 12:25           ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-04 12:37             ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-04 14:56             ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-05  0:47               ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-08-05 21:55                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-06  0:27                   ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-08-06  0:48                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-06  0:33                   ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-08-06  0:51                     ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2014-08-06 22:48                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-07  8:49                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-07 15:43                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-07 16:32                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-07 17:48                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-08 19:13   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-08 20:58     ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-09  6:15       ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-09 12:44         ` Steven Rostedt
2014-08-09 16:05           ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-09 16:01         ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-09 18:19           ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-09 18:24             ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-10  1:29               ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-10  8:14                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-11  3:30                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-11 11:57                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-11 16:15                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-10  1:26             ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-10  8:12               ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-10 16:46                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-11  3:28                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-11  3:23                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-09 18:33       ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-10  1:38         ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-08-10 15:00           ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-11  3:37             ` Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140806005101.GW8101@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bobby.prani@gmail.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).