public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
	mingo@kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] s390/locking: Reenable optimistic spinning
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2014 10:34:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140806083453.GA4983@osiris> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1407225471-14875-1-git-send-email-borntraeger@de.ibm.com>

On Tue, Aug 05, 2014 at 09:57:51AM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> commit 4badad352a6bb202ec68afa7a574c0bb961e5ebc (locking/mutex: Disable
> optimistic spinning on some architectures) fenced spinning for
> architectures without proper cmpxchg.
> There is no need to disable mutex spinning on s390, though:
> The instructions CS,CSG and friends provide the proper guarantees.
> (We dont implement cmpxchg with locks).
> 
> Please note: This is a quick fix for s390, suitable for stable
> as 3.16 unintenionally disabled optimistic spinning.
> 
> The proper fix is probably to use ARCH_HAVE_NMI_SAFE_CMPXCHG
> instead of introducing ARCH_SUPPORTS_ATOMIC_RMW.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
> CC: <mingo@kernel.org>
> CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
> ---
>  arch/s390/Kconfig | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/s390/Kconfig b/arch/s390/Kconfig
> index 9a0ea87..eab3c32 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/s390/Kconfig
> @@ -63,6 +63,7 @@ config S390
>  	select ARCH_HAS_ATOMIC64_DEC_IF_POSITIVE
>  	select ARCH_HAS_DEBUG_STRICT_USER_COPY_CHECKS
>  	select ARCH_HAVE_NMI_SAFE_CMPXCHG
> +	select ARCH_SUPPORTS_ATOMIC_RMW
>  	select ARCH_INLINE_READ_LOCK
>  	select ARCH_INLINE_READ_LOCK_BH
>  	select ARCH_INLINE_READ_LOCK_IRQ

This can go in via the s390 tree. I applied your patch and changed
it a bit to keep Kconfig sorted.
Thanks!


      reply	other threads:[~2014-08-06  8:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-08-05  7:57 [PATCH] s390/locking: Reenable optimistic spinning Christian Borntraeger
2014-08-06  8:34 ` Heiko Carstens [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140806083453.GA4983@osiris \
    --to=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox