From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: WARN_ON_ONCE(in_nmi()) hit in irq_work_queue_on
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2014 15:18:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140807131840.GC19662@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140807131536.GU9918@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Thu, Aug 07, 2014 at 03:15:36PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 07, 2014 at 02:58:55PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 07, 2014 at 10:13:21AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > On Thu, Aug 07, 2014 at 01:44:58AM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > > > In fact the problem has arised since the recent irq work patches I did.
> > >
> > > No, those just added the WARN, previously we send the resched IPI, and
> > > that's equally wrong from NMI context.
> >
> > Well the scheduler IPI was rather used for remote kicks before we had remote irq
> > work. This includes local kicks as well as the caller could need to kick
> > anywhere. As in inc_nr_running().
> >
> > But for strict local kicks, as in perf, we were using tick_nohz_full_kick() which has
> > been using irq work for a while. But it got broken when we replaced it to call irq_work_queue_on
> > instead of irq_work_queue.
>
> OK, clearly I made a mess of things in my head ;-)
I'm a bit responsible for that mess since I created quite some flavours of nohz kicks
all around :)
But now they should be more unified.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-07 13:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-06 16:21 WARN_ON_ONCE(in_nmi()) hit in irq_work_queue_on Dave Jones
2014-08-06 16:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-06 16:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-06 17:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-06 23:44 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-08-07 8:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-07 12:58 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-08-07 13:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-07 13:18 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140807131840.GC19662@localhost.localdomain \
--to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox