Re: [PATCH] tracing: generate RCU warnings even when tracepoints are disabled

["Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>]

On Fri, Aug 08, 2014 at 02:30:22PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Aug 2014 11:13:56 -0700
> "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, Aug 07, 2014 at 10:52:04AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> > > 
> > > From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
> > > 
> > > Dave Jones reported seeing a bug from one of my TLB tracepoints:
> > > 
> > > 	http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140806181801.GA4605@redhat.com
> > > 
> > > I've been running these patches for months and never saw this.
> > > But, a big chunk of my testing, especially with all the debugging
> > > enabled, was in a vm where intel_idle doesn't work.  On the
> > > systems where I was using intel_idle, I never had lockdep enabled
> > > and this tracepoint on at the same time.
> > > 
> > > This patch ensures that whenever we have lockdep available, we do
> > > _some_ RCU activity at the site of the tracepoint, despite
> > > whether the tracepoint's condition matches or even if the
> > > tracepoint itself is completely disabled.  This is a bit of a
> > > hack, but it is pretty self-contained.
> > > 
> > > I confirmed that with this patch plus lockdep I get the same
> > > splat as Dave Jones did, but without enabling the tracepoint
> > > explicitly.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
> > > Cc: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
> > > Cc: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com
> > > Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> > > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
> > 
> > Looks good to me, but I must defer to Steven on this one.
> 
> Looks fine. I can add it to my 3.18 queue.
> 
> Paul, want to send me an "Acked-by"?

Here you go:

Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

							Thanx, Paul