From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754155AbaHKW5I (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Aug 2014 18:57:08 -0400 Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.27]:35601 "EHLO out3-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753190AbaHKW5F (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Aug 2014 18:57:05 -0400 X-Sasl-enc: LP0JeRl2XuqxHZj9fHXKU7KwY+280Io/HSInbGSaDaPS 1407797822 Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 06:55:27 +0800 From: Greg KH To: Amit Shah Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, Amos Kong , Virtualization List , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rusty Russell Subject: Re: [3.16 stable PATCH 1/1] virtio-rng: fix multi-device startup Message-ID: <20140811225527.GB10721@kroah.com> References: <5ef3aa4ea1932b7655d9db5a0139b8a2922af0db.1407760907.git.amit.shah@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5ef3aa4ea1932b7655d9db5a0139b8a2922af0db.1407760907.git.amit.shah@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 06:11:47PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote: > This is a 3.16-only patch. The linux.git fix is > 5c06273401f2eb7b290cadbae18ee00f8f65e893, which fixes this issue in a > different way. Why "different"? Why can't I take that original patch instead? What is different in this patch, and why? thanks, greg k-h