From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] nohz: Avoid double clock write
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 01:00:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140811230018.GA1492@lerouge> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1406825156-11901-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com>
Ping?
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 06:45:54PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> The tick reschedules itself unconditionally. That's what we want as long
> as the CPU is in periodic mode. It's not that relevant when the CPU
> is in dynticks mode though as the clock write is likely to be overwritten
> by the nohz code on irq exit.
>
> In low-res mode, that even result in unexpected periodic behaviour when
> no timer is scheduled in the future.
>
> So here is a set that proposes the removal of these double writes.
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/frederic/linux-dynticks.git
> origin/nohz/drop-double-write-v2
>
> Thanks,
> Frederic
> ---
>
> Viresh Kumar (2):
> nohz: Fix spurious periodic tick behaviour in low-res dynticks mode
> nohz: Avoid tick's double reprogramming in highres mode
>
>
> kernel/time/tick-sched.c | 8 ++++++++
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-11 23:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-31 16:45 [PATCH 0/2] nohz: Avoid double clock write Frederic Weisbecker
2014-07-31 16:45 ` [PATCH 1/2] nohz: Fix spurious periodic tick behaviour in low-res dynticks mode Frederic Weisbecker
2014-07-31 16:45 ` [PATCH 2/2] nohz: Avoid tick's double reprogramming in highres mode Frederic Weisbecker
2014-08-11 23:00 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140811230018.GA1492@lerouge \
--to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox