From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754737AbaHLI2Q (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Aug 2014 04:28:16 -0400 Received: from opensource.wolfsonmicro.com ([80.75.67.52]:49852 "EHLO opensource.wolfsonmicro.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751651AbaHLI2N (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Aug 2014 04:28:13 -0400 Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 09:28:11 +0100 From: Charles Keepax To: Inha Song Cc: broonie@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, sameo@linux.intel.com, pawel.moll@arm.com, ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk, patches@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lgirdwood@gmail.com, cw00.choi@samsung.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, galak@codeaurora.org, lee.jones@linaro.org Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 1/2] mfd: arizona: Add support for INn_MODE register control Message-ID: <20140812082811.GB15833@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <20140809173138.767b97fd@songinha-Samsung-DeskTop-System> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140809173138.767b97fd@songinha-Samsung-DeskTop-System> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Aug 09, 2014 at 05:31:38PM +0900, Inha Song wrote: > Some boards need to set the INn_MODE[1:0] register to change > the input signal patch. This wlf,inmode property is optional. > If present values must be specified by the number of > ARIZONA_MAX_INPUT. > > Example: > - wlf,inmode = <2 0 2 0>; /* IN1, IN3 use DMIC */ > > Signed-off-by: Inha Song > --- > drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c | 4 ++++ > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c b/drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c > index 10a0cb9..4b2eb73 100644 > --- a/drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c > +++ b/drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c > @@ -560,6 +560,10 @@ static int arizona_of_get_core_pdata(struct arizona *arizona) > ret); > } > > + of_property_read_u32_array(arizona->dev->of_node, > + "wlf,inmode", > + arizona->pdata.inmode, > + ARRAY_SIZE(arizona->pdata.inmode)); Might be better to allow the device tree to be shorter than the array in pdata, should this get expanded on future devices. Thanks, Charles