From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: "xiaofeng.yan" <xiaofeng.yan@huawei.com>
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@gmail.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xiaofeng.yan2012@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] sched/deadline: overrun could happen in start_hrtick_dl
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 16:52:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140812145254.GA7103@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1407316094-18207-1-git-send-email-xiaofeng.yan@huawei.com>
* xiaofeng.yan <xiaofeng.yan@huawei.com> wrote:
> It could be wrong for the precision of runtime and deadline
> when the precision is within microsecond level. For example:
> Task runtime deadline period
> P1 200us 500us 500us
>
> This case need enbale HRTICK feature by the next command
>
> PC#echo "HRTICK" > /sys/kernel/debug/sched_features
> PC#trace-cmd record -e sched_switch &
> PC#./schedtool -E -t 200000:500000 -e ./test
>
> Some of runtime and deadline run with millisecond level by
> reading kernershark. Some pieces of trace.dat are as follows:
> (remove some irrelevant information)
> <idle>-0 157.603157: sched_switch: :R ==> 2481:4294967295: test
> test-2481 157.603203: sched_switch: 2481:R ==> 0:120: swapper/2
> <idle>-0 157.605657: sched_switch: :R ==> 2481:4294967295: test
> test-2481 157.608183: sched_switch: 2481:R ==> 2483:120: trace-cmd
> trace-cmd-2483 157.609656: sched_switch:2483:R==>2481:4294967295: test
>
> We can get the runtime from the information at some point.
> runtime = 157.605657 - 157.608183
> runtime = 0.002526(2.526ms)
> The correct runtime should be less than or equal to 200us at some point.
>
> The problem is caused by a conditional judgment "delta > 10000".
> Because no hrtimer start up to control the runtime when runtime is less than 10us.
> So the process will continue to run until tick-period coming.
>
> Move the code with the limit of the least time slice
> from hrtick_start_fair() to hrtick_start() because
> EDF schedule class also need this function in start_hrtick_dl().
>
> To fix this problem, we call hrtimer_start() unconditionally in start_hrtick_dl(),
> and make sure schedule slice won't be smaller than 10us in hrtimer_start().
>
> Signed-off-by: Xiaofeng Yan <xiaofeng.yan@huawei.com>
> Reviewed-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Reviewed-by: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
The whole changelog is very hard to read and isn't proper English, nor
is it truly explanatory. Could you please fix the changelog, or bounce
it to someone who will fix it for you?
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-12 14:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-06 9:08 [PATCH v3] sched/deadline: overrun could happen in start_hrtick_dl xiaofeng.yan
2014-08-06 10:39 ` Juri Lelli
2014-08-12 14:52 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2014-08-15 8:38 ` xiaofeng.yan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140812145254.GA7103@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=juri.lelli@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=xiaofeng.yan2012@gmail.com \
--cc=xiaofeng.yan@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox