From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754254AbaHLRic (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Aug 2014 13:38:32 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:4653 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754125AbaHLRia (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Aug 2014 13:38:30 -0400 Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 19:35:53 +0200 From: Oleg Nesterov To: Greg Ungerer Cc: Andrew Morton , Alexander Viro , Cyrill Gorcunov , David Howells , "David S. Miller" , "Eric W. Biederman" , "Kirill A. Shutemov" , "Kirill A. Shutemov" , Peter Zijlstra , Sasha Levin , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] fs/proc/task_nommu.c: copy-and-paste the changes from task_mmu.c Message-ID: <20140812173553.GA15112@redhat.com> References: <20140805194627.GA30693@redhat.com> <20140811170008.GA24629@redhat.com> <53EA1D4B.5030401@uclinux.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <53EA1D4B.5030401@uclinux.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 08/12, Greg Ungerer wrote: > > Hi Oleg, > > On 12/08/14 03:00, Oleg Nesterov wrote: >> Greg, could you review? The changes are simple, but I am not familiar >> with NOMMU and I can't test this. >> >> Depends on >> >> [PATCH v2 3/7] proc: introduce proc_mem_open() >> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=140726831328943 >> >> [PATCH v2 4/7] fs/proc/task_mmu.c: shift mm_access() from m_start() to proc_maps_open() >> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=140726828328929 >> (only because it adds proc_maps_private->mm) >> >> I'll also send you mbox with the previous series just in case. >> >> Oleg. >> >> fs/proc/task_nommu.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------- >> 1 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) > > I don't see any problems. Applied cleanly for me (to a 3.16-rc7 tree), > compiled > cleanly for a non-mmu m68k target, and ran with no problems I could see. > At least I checked /proc/1/maps and that still came out fine. Is there > anything > else I should check? Great, hopefully nothing else. > I am happy to ack it: > > Acked-by: Greg Ungerer Thanks a lot! I'll send more cleanups once/if Andrew takes the pending patches. Oleg.