public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Xinwei Hu <huxinwei@huawei.com>,
	Wuyun <wuyun.wu@huawei.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	arnab.basu@freescale.com, x86@kernel.org,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	Sebastian Ott <sebott@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 07/20] x86/MSI: Use msi_chip instead of arch func to configure MSI/MSI-X
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 15:09:47 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140812190947.GD13996@laptop.dumpdata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1407828373-24322-8-git-send-email-wangyijing@huawei.com>

On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 03:26:00PM +0800, Yijing Wang wrote:
> Introduce a new struct msi_chip apic_msi_chip instead of weak arch
> functions to configure MSI/MSI-X in x86.

Why not 'x86_msi_ops' (see  arch/x86/kernel/x86_init.c)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/pci.h     |    1 +
>  arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c |   20 ++++++++++++++++----
>  2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/pci.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/pci.h
> index 0892ea0..878a06d 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/pci.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/pci.h
> @@ -101,6 +101,7 @@ void native_teardown_msi_irq(unsigned int irq);
>  void native_restore_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev);
>  int setup_msi_irq(struct pci_dev *dev, struct msi_desc *msidesc,
>  		  unsigned int irq_base, unsigned int irq_offset);
> +extern struct msi_chip *x86_msi_chip;
>  #else
>  #define native_setup_msi_irqs		NULL
>  #define native_teardown_msi_irq		NULL
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
> index 2609dcd..eb8ab7c 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
> @@ -3077,24 +3077,25 @@ int setup_msi_irq(struct pci_dev *dev, struct msi_desc *msidesc,
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -int native_setup_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev, int nvec, int type)
> +int native_setup_msi_irqs(struct device *dev, int nvec, int type)
>  {
>  	struct msi_desc *msidesc;
>  	unsigned int irq;
>  	int node, ret;
> +	struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
>  
>  	/* Multiple MSI vectors only supported with interrupt remapping */
>  	if (type == PCI_CAP_ID_MSI && nvec > 1)
>  		return 1;
>  
> -	node = dev_to_node(&dev->dev);
> +	node = dev_to_node(dev);
>  
> -	list_for_each_entry(msidesc, &dev->msi_list, list) {
> +	list_for_each_entry(msidesc, &pdev->msi_list, list) {
>  		irq = irq_alloc_hwirq(node);
>  		if (!irq)
>  			return -ENOSPC;
>  
> -		ret = setup_msi_irq(dev, msidesc, irq, 0);
> +		ret = setup_msi_irq(pdev, msidesc, irq, 0);
>  		if (ret < 0) {
>  			irq_free_hwirq(irq);
>  			return ret;
> @@ -3214,6 +3215,17 @@ int default_setup_hpet_msi(unsigned int irq, unsigned int id)
>  }
>  #endif
>  
> +struct msi_chip apic_msi_chip = {
> +	.setup_irqs = native_setup_msi_irqs,
> +	.teardown_irq = native_teardown_msi_irq,
> +};
> +
> +struct msi_chip *arch_get_match_msi_chip(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	return x86_msi_chip;
> +}
> +
> +struct msi_chip *x86_msi_chip = &apic_msi_chip;
>  #endif /* CONFIG_PCI_MSI */
>  /*
>   * Hypertransport interrupt support
> -- 
> 1.7.1
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2014-08-12 19:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-08-12  7:25 [RFC PATCH 00/20] Use msi_chip to configure MSI/MSI-X in all platforms Yijing Wang
2014-08-12  7:25 ` [RFC PATCH 01/20] x86/xen/MSI: Eliminate arch_msix_mask_irq() and arch_msi_mask_irq() Yijing Wang
2014-08-12  9:09   ` [Xen-devel] " David Vrabel
2014-08-12 11:11     ` Yijing Wang
2014-08-12  7:25 ` [RFC PATCH 04/20] MSI: Remove the redundant irq_set_chip_data() Yijing Wang
2014-08-12  7:25 ` [RFC PATCH 06/20] PCI/MSI: Introduce arch_get_match_msi_chip() to find the match msi_chip Yijing Wang
2014-08-12  7:26 ` [RFC PATCH 07/20] x86/MSI: Use msi_chip instead of arch func to configure MSI/MSI-X Yijing Wang
2014-08-12 19:09   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
2014-08-13  1:16     ` Yijing Wang
2014-08-12  7:26 ` [RFC PATCH 08/20] x86/xen/MSI: " Yijing Wang
2014-08-12  7:26 ` [RFC PATCH 09/20] irq_remapping/MSI: " Yijing Wang
2014-08-12  7:26 ` [RFC PATCH 10/20] x86/MSI: Remove unused MSI weak arch functions Yijing Wang
2014-08-12  7:26 ` [RFC PATCH 11/20] MIPS/Octeon/MSI: Use msi_chip instead of arch func to configure MSI/MSI-X Yijing Wang
2014-08-12  7:26 ` [RFC PATCH 12/20] MIPS/Xlp/MSI: " Yijing Wang
2014-08-12  7:26 ` [RFC PATCH 13/20] MIPS/xlr/MSI: " Yijing Wang
2014-08-12  7:26 ` [RFC PATCH 14/20] Powerpc/MSI: " Yijing Wang
2014-08-12  7:26 ` [RFC PATCH 15/20] s390/MSI: " Yijing Wang
2014-08-12  7:26 ` [RFC PATCH 16/20] arm/iop13xx/MSI: " Yijing Wang
2014-08-12  7:26 ` [RFC PATCH 17/20] IA64/MSI: " Yijing Wang
2014-08-12  7:26 ` [RFC PATCH 18/20] Sparc/MSI: " Yijing Wang
2014-08-12  7:26 ` [RFC PATCH 19/20] tile/MSI: " Yijing Wang
2014-08-12  7:26 ` [RFC PATCH 20/20] PCI/MSI: Clean up unused MSI arch functions Yijing Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140812190947.GD13996@laptop.dumpdata.com \
    --to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=arnab.basu@freescale.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=cmetcalf@tilera.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=huxinwei@huawei.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=sebott@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=wangyijing@huawei.com \
    --cc=wuyun.wu@huawei.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox