From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753599AbaHMRGv (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Aug 2014 13:06:51 -0400 Received: from mail-pa0-f54.google.com ([209.85.220.54]:41800 "EHLO mail-pa0-f54.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753418AbaHMRGs (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Aug 2014 13:06:48 -0400 Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 10:06:45 -0700 From: Alexei Starovoitov To: Eric Dumazet Cc: Himangi Saraogi , "David S. Miller" , Alexey Kuznetsov , James Morris , Hideaki YOSHIFUJI , Patrick McHardy , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Julia Lawall Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/udp_offload: Drop unnecessary continue Message-ID: <20140813170644.GA13556@its-macbook-pro.westell.com> References: <20140813091605.GA2947@himangi-Dell> <1407941291.6804.7.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1407941291.6804.7.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 07:48:11AM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote: > On Wed, 2014-08-13 at 14:46 +0530, Himangi Saraogi wrote: > > Continue is not needed at the bottom of a loop. > > > > The Coccinelle semantic patch implementing this change is: > > > > @@ > > @@ > > > > for (...;...;...) { > > ... > > if (...) { > > ... > > - continue; > > } > > } > > > > Signed-off-by: Himangi Saraogi > > Acked-by: Julia Lawall > > --- > > net/ipv4/udp_offload.c | 4 +--- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/net/ipv4/udp_offload.c b/net/ipv4/udp_offload.c > > index 59035bc..62d5b9b 100644 > > --- a/net/ipv4/udp_offload.c > > +++ b/net/ipv4/udp_offload.c > > @@ -269,10 +269,8 @@ unflush: > > continue; > > > > uh2 = (struct udphdr *)(p->data + off); > > - if ((*(u32 *)&uh->source != *(u32 *)&uh2->source)) { > > + if ((*(u32 *)&uh->source != *(u32 *)&uh2->source)) > > NAPI_GRO_CB(p)->same_flow = 0; > > - continue; > > - } > > } > > > > skb_gro_pull(skb, sizeof(struct udphdr)); /* pull encapsulating udp header */ > > > Please do not do that. > > If we add another check later, we'll miss that the 'continue;' needs to > be put back. > > GRO stack is quite difficult to maintain, I prefer we keep this as is > for consistency and code readability. +1 this code as-is is definitely more readable