From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755232AbaHNPAd (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Aug 2014 11:00:33 -0400 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:41045 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754329AbaHNPAc (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Aug 2014 11:00:32 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,862,1389772800"; d="scan'208";a="372401199" Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 08:00:31 -0700 From: Andi Kleen To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Andi Kleen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org, eranian@google.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] perf, x86: Document all Haswell models Message-ID: <20140814150031.GR5803@tassilo.jf.intel.com> References: <1407979069-7121-1-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.org> <1407979069-7121-3-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.org> <20140814070122.GC16043@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140814070122.GC16043@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Would something like this be accurate:? I believe my version is more accurate, but feel free to use yours. -Andi -- ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only