From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
To: Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@suse.cz>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>,
linux390@de.ibm.com, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/5] s390/ftrace: add HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS support
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2014 14:00:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140815120031.GE4215@osiris> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140815115753.GA4215@osiris>
This code is based on a patch from Vojtech Pavlik.
http://marc.info/?l=linux-s390&m=140438885114413&w=2
The actual implementation now differs significantly:
Instead of adding a second function "ftrace_regs_caller" which would be nearly
identical to the existing ftrace_caller function, the current ftrace_caller
function is now an alias to ftrace_regs_caller and always passes the needed
pt_regs structure and function_trace_op parameters unconditionally.
Besides that also use asm offsets to correctly allocate and access the new
struct pt_regs on the stack.
While at it we can make use of new instruction to get rid of some indirect
loads if compiled for new machines.
The passed struct pt_regs can be changed by the called function and it's new
contents will replace the current contents. E.g. r14 can be modified to change
the return address of a traced function.
We explicitly do not use the psw_t member of struct pt_regs to pass (and
modify) r14, since that would result in a fake psw where the mask member is
invalid. In addition r14 and the psw_t member have different semantics
anyway.
Cc: Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@suse.cz>
Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
---
arch/s390/Kconfig | 1 +
arch/s390/include/asm/ftrace.h | 4 ++++
arch/s390/kernel/ftrace.c | 5 +++++
arch/s390/kernel/mcount64.S | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
4 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/s390/Kconfig b/arch/s390/Kconfig
index ab39ceb89ecf..2d935cb77393 100644
--- a/arch/s390/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/s390/Kconfig
@@ -116,6 +116,7 @@ config S390
select HAVE_C_RECORDMCOUNT
select HAVE_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK
select HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE
+ select HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS if 64BIT
select HAVE_FTRACE_MCOUNT_RECORD
select HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER
select HAVE_FUNCTION_TRACER
diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/ftrace.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/ftrace.h
index 874f903c2eb4..d419362dc231 100644
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/ftrace.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/ftrace.h
@@ -24,4 +24,8 @@ static inline unsigned long ftrace_call_adjust(unsigned long addr)
#define MCOUNT_INSN_SIZE 22
#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
+#define ARCH_SUPPORTS_FTRACE_OPS 1
+#endif
+
#endif /* _ASM_S390_FTRACE_H */
diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/ftrace.c b/arch/s390/kernel/ftrace.c
index 7dc7df3857c4..69eb49ccf8a4 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/ftrace.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/ftrace.c
@@ -107,6 +107,11 @@ asm(
#endif /* CONFIG_64BIT */
+int ftrace_modify_call(struct dyn_ftrace *rec, unsigned long old_addr,
+ unsigned long addr)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
int ftrace_make_nop(struct module *mod, struct dyn_ftrace *rec,
unsigned long addr)
diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/mcount64.S b/arch/s390/kernel/mcount64.S
index b03896d29274..92f8994f37b8 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/mcount64.S
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/mcount64.S
@@ -8,45 +8,60 @@
#include <linux/linkage.h>
#include <asm/asm-offsets.h>
#include <asm/ftrace.h>
+#include <asm/ptrace.h>
.section .kprobes.text, "ax"
ENTRY(ftrace_stub)
br %r14
+#define STACK_FRAME_SIZE (STACK_FRAME_OVERHEAD + __PT_SIZE)
+#define STACK_PARENT_IP (STACK_FRAME_SIZE + 8)
+#define STACK_PTREGS (STACK_FRAME_OVERHEAD)
+#define STACK_PTREGS_GPRS (STACK_PTREGS + __PT_GPRS)
+
ENTRY(_mcount)
#ifdef CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE
br %r14
ENTRY(ftrace_caller)
+ .globl ftrace_regs_caller
+ .set ftrace_regs_caller,ftrace_caller
#endif
- stmg %r2,%r5,32(%r15)
- stg %r14,112(%r15)
lgr %r1,%r15
- aghi %r15,-160
+ aghi %r15,-STACK_FRAME_SIZE
stg %r1,__SF_BACKCHAIN(%r15)
+ stg %r1,(STACK_PTREGS_GPRS+15*8)(%r15)
+ stmg %r0,%r14,STACK_PTREGS_GPRS(%r15)
+#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_MARCH_Z196_FEATURES
+ aghik %r2,%r14,-MCOUNT_INSN_SIZE
+ lgrl %r4,function_trace_op
+ lgrl %r14,ftrace_trace_function
+#else
lgr %r2,%r14
- lg %r3,168(%r15)
aghi %r2,-MCOUNT_INSN_SIZE
+ larl %r4,function_trace_op
+ lg %r4,0(%r4)
larl %r14,ftrace_trace_function
lg %r14,0(%r14)
+#endif
+ lg %r3,STACK_PARENT_IP(%r15)
+ la %r5,STACK_PTREGS(%r15)
basr %r14,%r14
#ifdef CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER
-# The j instruction gets runtime patched to a nop instruction.
+ENTRY(ftrace_graph_caller)
+# The bras instruction gets runtime patched to call prepare_ftrace_return.
# See ftrace_enable_ftrace_graph_caller. The patched instruction is:
# j .+2
-ENTRY(ftrace_graph_caller)
j ftrace_graph_caller_end
- lg %r2,168(%r15)
- lg %r3,272(%r15)
- brasl %r14,prepare_ftrace_return
- stg %r2,168(%r15)
+ lg %r2,STACK_PARENT_IP(%r15)
+ lg %r3,(STACK_PTREGS_GPRS+14*8)(%r15)
+ bras %r14,prepare_ftrace_return
+ stg %r2,STACK_PARENT_IP(%r15)
ftrace_graph_caller_end:
.globl ftrace_graph_caller_end
#endif
- aghi %r15,160
- lmg %r2,%r5,32(%r15)
- lg %r14,112(%r15)
+ lmg %r0,%r15,STACK_PTREGS_GPRS(%r15)
br %r14
#ifdef CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER
@@ -54,10 +69,10 @@ ftrace_graph_caller_end:
ENTRY(return_to_handler)
stmg %r2,%r5,32(%r15)
lgr %r1,%r15
- aghi %r15,-160
+ aghi %r15,-STACK_FRAME_OVERHEAD
stg %r1,__SF_BACKCHAIN(%r15)
brasl %r14,ftrace_return_to_handler
- aghi %r15,160
+ aghi %r15,STACK_FRAME_OVERHEAD
lgr %r14,%r2
lmg %r2,%r5,32(%r15)
br %r14
--
1.8.5.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-15 12:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-03 12:00 [PATCH] s390: add support for DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS Vojtech Pavlik
2014-07-08 8:07 ` Heiko Carstens
2014-08-15 11:57 ` Heiko Carstens
2014-08-15 11:59 ` [PATCH 1/5] s390: pass march flag to assembly files as well Heiko Carstens
2014-08-15 11:59 ` [PATCH 2/5] s390/ftrace: optimize patched mcount calling code Heiko Carstens
2014-08-15 12:00 ` [PATCH 3/5] s390/ftrace: optimize function graph caller code Heiko Carstens
2014-08-15 12:00 ` Heiko Carstens [this message]
2014-08-15 12:01 ` [PATCH 5/5] s390/ftrace: enforce DYNAMIC_FTRACE if FUNCTION_TRACER is selected Heiko Carstens
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140815120031.GE4215@osiris \
--to=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
--cc=jslaby@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux390@de.ibm.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=vojtech@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox