From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751787AbaHOPKn (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Aug 2014 11:10:43 -0400 Received: from cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com ([217.140.96.50]:41059 "EHLO cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751663AbaHOPKl (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Aug 2014 11:10:41 -0400 Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2014 16:09:52 +0100 From: Will Deacon To: Dave Young Cc: Matt Fleming , Catalin Marinas , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "hpa@zytor.com" , Alessandro Zummo , Leif Lindholm , Ard Biesheuvel , "msalter@redhat.com" , Randy Dunlap , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-efi@vger.kernel.org" , Daniel Kiper , Russ Anderson Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] arm64/efi: do not enter virtual mode in case booting with efi=noruntime or noefi Message-ID: <20140815150952.GY27466@arm.com> References: <1408007731-15081-1-git-send-email-dyoung@redhat.com> <1408007731-15081-5-git-send-email-dyoung@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1408007731-15081-5-git-send-email-dyoung@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 10:15:30AM +0100, Dave Young wrote: > In case efi runtime disabled via noefi kernel cmdline arm64_enter_virtual_mode > should error out. > > At the same time move early_memunmap(memmap.map, mapsize) to the beginning of > the function or it will leak early mem. > > Signed-off-by: Dave Young > --- > arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c | 9 +++++++-- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c > index 6ed0362..309fab1 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c > @@ -392,11 +392,16 @@ static int __init arm64_enter_virtual_mode(void) > return -1; > } > > + mapsize = memmap.map_end - memmap.map; > + if (efi_runtime_disabled()) { > + early_memunmap(memmap.map, mapsize); Should this early_memunmap really be conditional? With this change, we no longer unmap it before setting up the permanent mapping below. Will > + pr_info("EFI runtime services will be disabled.\n"); > + return -1; > + } > + > pr_info("Remapping and enabling EFI services.\n"); > > /* replace early memmap mapping with permanent mapping */ > - mapsize = memmap.map_end - memmap.map; > - early_memunmap(memmap.map, mapsize); > memmap.map = (__force void *)ioremap_cache((phys_addr_t)memmap.phys_map, > mapsize); > memmap.map_end = memmap.map + mapsize; > -- > 1.8.3.1 > >