public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Markus Osterhoff <mo@mo-online.org>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [TYPO 9/9] [typo] spelling, punctuation in Documentation/...
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 10:46:00 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140818084600.GA13463@mo-online.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53F1AD31.3030109@infradead.org>

Dear Randy,

thanks for you reply.

* Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> [140818 09:37]:
> On 08/17/14 11:30, Markus Osterhoff wrote:
> > diff --git a/Documentation/HOWTO b/Documentation/HOWTO
> > -gcc`) for some information on them.
> > +gcc') for some information on them.
> Backquotes imply that the contents (string) can be entered at a shell prompt;
> i.e., they are a command.
Ah, I see.

> > -It is worth mentioning what Andrew Morton wrote on the linux-kernel
> > +It is worth mentioning what Andrew Morton wrote on the Linux-kernel
> The mailing list is "linux-kernel".
Stupid me, sorry :)

> > diff --git a/Documentation/ManagementStyle b/Documentation/ManagementStyle
> > -Btw, when talking about "kernel manager", it's all about the technical
> > +Btw., when talking about "kernel manager", it's all about the technical
> BTW (or Btw) is common -- no period.
Okay.

> > diff --git a/Documentation/SubmittingPatches b/Documentation/SubmittingPatches
> > index 0a523c9..a358031 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/SubmittingPatches
> > +++ b/Documentation/SubmittingPatches
> > @@ -227,8 +227,8 @@ Linux kernel.  His e-mail address is <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>.
> >  He gets a lot of e-mail, so typically you should do your best to -avoid-
> >  sending him e-mail. 
> >  
> > -Patches which are bug fixes, are "obvious" changes, or similarly
> > -require little discussion should be sent or CC'd to Linus.  Patches
> > +Patches, which are bug fixes, are "obvious" changes, or similarly
> 
>    Patches which are bug fixes or "obvious" changes or similarly
> 
> > +require little discussion, should be sent or CC'd to Linus.  Patches
>   why the added comma?
My feeling is this increases the comprehensibility.

> >  which require discussion or do not have a clear advantage should
> >  usually be sent first to linux-kernel.  Only after the patch is
> >  discussed should the patch then be submitted to Linus.
Greetings,
Markus


      reply	other threads:[~2014-08-18  8:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-08-17 18:30 [TYPO 9/9] [typo] spelling, punctuation in Documentation/ Markus Osterhoff
2014-08-18  7:37 ` Randy Dunlap
2014-08-18  8:46   ` Markus Osterhoff [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140818084600.GA13463@mo-online.de \
    --to=mo@mo-online.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox