From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964882AbaH0SyI (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Aug 2014 14:54:08 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:64547 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753594AbaH0SyG (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Aug 2014 14:54:06 -0400 Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 20:51:38 +0200 From: Oleg Nesterov To: Al Viro , Andrew Morton , Fenghua Yu , Linus Torvalds , Suresh Siddha Cc: Bean Anderson , "H. Peter Anvin" , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH 0/4] x86, fpu: copy_process's FPU paths cleanups Message-ID: <20140827185138.GA12487@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, Who can review this? And where should I send FPU changes? And it seems that nobody cares about 2 fixes I sent before. Linus, I understand that you won't take them into v3.17, but perhaps you can ack/nack them explicitly? It seems that nobody can do this. Oleg. arch/x86/include/asm/fpu-internal.h | 2 +- arch/x86/kernel/process.c | 16 +++++++++------- arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c | 2 -- arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c | 1 - 4 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)