From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ricardo.ribalda@gmail.com>
Cc: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>,
Linux USB Mailing List <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: gadget: net2280: Remove pci_class from PCI_TABLE
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 14:11:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140827211109.GA26897@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPybu_1GRUTvatLeyst_M+0g0k8e=1z+F11eEyHkBonvYespCg@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 11:03:00PM +0200, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado wrote:
> Hello Greg
>
> >>
> >> Not many drivers define the pci interface and there is no other driver
> >> that has the same vendor and product id. Therefore I see no hurt in
> >> adding both patches, one to make the driver broader, and another to
> >> fix pci-sysfs.
> >>
> >> Also, the change on pci-sysfs might affect more stuff and therefore
> >> take longer to be applied.
> >
> > As we have been printing the value to userspace in this way for well
> > over a decade now, and nothing has changed, I say it's a userspace bug
> > that you should fix instead. Don't work around broken user programs in
> > the kernel by changing something that has been stable for 10+ years.
> >
> > Ok, sorry, not 10+ years, the commit was written May of 2005, so 9
> > years.
> >
> > Fix your module loading code please.
>
> On the other thread ( https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/8/27/242 ) we have
> agreed about fixing this thing on pci-sysfs.c .
>
> Still I think that there is no good reason to add the pci interface to
> the pci_table on this driver. Therefore I consider that this patch is
> still valid.
>
> What do you think. This patch is NACK?
Yeah, I don't think this patch is needed as it properly sets the class
of the device to be matched against, so it should not be necessary at
all.
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-27 21:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-27 13:00 [PATCH] usb: gadget: net2280: Remove pci_class from PCI_TABLE Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
2014-08-27 19:25 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2014-08-27 19:39 ` Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
2014-08-27 20:22 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2014-08-27 21:03 ` Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
2014-08-27 21:11 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2014-08-27 21:09 ` Bjørn Mork
2014-08-27 23:43 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140827211109.GA26897@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=balbi@ti.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ricardo.ribalda@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox