From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752531AbaIBCFK (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Sep 2014 22:05:10 -0400 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:16454 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751897AbaIBCFJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Sep 2014 22:05:09 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,446,1406617200"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="566858518" Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2014 21:31:59 -0400 From: "Chen, Gong" To: Bjorn Helgaas Cc: Randy Dunlap , Borislav Petkov , Tony Luck , "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [RESEND 0/5] PCIe, AER: Misc cleanup Message-ID: <20140902013159.GA14916@gchen.bj.intel.com> References: <1407910961-7798-1-git-send-email-gong.chen@linux.intel.com> <20140814015236.GB28066@gchen.bj.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140814015236.GB28066@gchen.bj.intel.com> X-PGP-Key-ID: A43922C7 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 09:52:36PM -0400, Chen, Gong wrote: > Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 21:52:36 -0400 > From: "Chen, Gong" > To: Bjorn Helgaas > Cc: Randy Dunlap , Borislav Petkov , > Tony Luck , "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" > , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" > > Subject: Re: [RESEND 0/5] PCIe, AER: Misc cleanup > User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) >=20 > On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 07:52:45AM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > I haven't responded because I've been on vacation for the past three > > weeks. If there's no change in the patches themselves, and if they > > are still in http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-pci/list, the > > only thing reposting them does is make more work for me. > >=20 > There is one difference existed in Patch 1. I add more explanation in > the comments as Boris suggested. Hi, Bjorn Any comments? --ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUBR4PAAoJEI01n1+kOSLHG8wP/3c5jeGxOLELLqUsLXVN1S5R N6EUZ0xpgSWGRlJrHD/mnUAiygSJ4G04DKUqTLMNET9Abfalsr1lMmI+Q762QYY1 OsayTtuwwaaeJtfk1p0pFlMmjXDNhhIuv8scfq9AV2vm9WqxxEd9rpcLUIcLsp2z AcutviE66XR5G3nB3zxY9ASIVJDJ7A8So7EgF9ajGlHYpAmp6xbW2qzry1gDoeZJ QDXcEFp9MbUUfewdGuvYq+epOpfEr2OpwNfSlnAl949cDap/RdvXgdrQs+U1gvM7 cqatmDoB/qWhRs+jfI5zPq1BdACO5njCtxntHDrWaKBGpSA+hm/1xmC/g/5En7Kz cqQJC+NHM2wkhphmktQVJsmzWMxDLkxUvGpBJ3wJqYQSG/KLFy1fl9SneKTztlGz 4D7I/BpRBMF9QA1LS7LBMh7XJ64tJJOp8+TLRtNuoH0BSVuATPH6pNKrKRx0k3bX 4qm1TU4KzERMjbYTitv33Cu/SHj9SNL5E0IXzCtu12SAIEam6bS3/2szDCUGTd8L de9UbIMkvUaQlVduxav5K/3SpoDrjKtfsE3wtf2+CqQzxzZvkhGwXeC92GzYiZqt kLY9ZAzMbRvD8Sbsx7JKEZ5N7U4Ifnrb6B26x4s2Qa0r3gDJqBZR3jOXh3lMTVVh K08O7/VnKCCAJiHswJFm =y6e5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW--