From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752915AbaIBCLV (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Sep 2014 22:11:21 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:49322 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751832AbaIBCLU (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Sep 2014 22:11:20 -0400 Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2014 19:11:19 -0700 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Axel Lin Cc: Philipp Zabel , Lucas Stach , Sascha Hauer , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] gpu: ipu-v3: Select GENERIC_IRQ_CHIP to fix build error Message-ID: <20140902021119.GA2525@kroah.com> References: <1407033419.17812.2.camel@phoenix> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 09:47:37AM +0800, Axel Lin wrote: > 2014-08-03 10:36 GMT+08:00 Axel Lin : > > This driver uses GENERIC_IRQ_CHIP, so it needs to select GENERIC_IRQ_CHIP to > > avoid build error. > > > > Fixes below build errors: > > ERROR: "irq_alloc_domain_generic_chips" [drivers/gpu/ipu-v3/imx-ipu-v3.ko] undefined! > > ERROR: "irq_gc_mask_clr_bit" [drivers/gpu/ipu-v3/imx-ipu-v3.ko] undefined! > > ERROR: "irq_gc_mask_set_bit" [drivers/gpu/ipu-v3/imx-ipu-v3.ko] undefined! > > ERROR: "irq_generic_chip_ops" [drivers/gpu/ipu-v3/imx-ipu-v3.ko] undefined! > > ERROR: "irq_gc_ack_set_bit" [drivers/gpu/ipu-v3/imx-ipu-v3.ko] undefined! > > ERROR: "irq_get_domain_generic_chip" [drivers/gpu/ipu-v3/imx-ipu-v3.ko] undefined! > > make[1]: *** [__modpost] Error 1 > > make: *** [modules] Error 2 > > Hi Greg, > > I still hit this build error in today's linuex-next tree with below config: > ARCH_MULTIPLATFORM && !SOC_IMX5 && !SOC_IMX6Q && !SOC_IMX6SL > > This driver just moved from staging to gpu. > So it's not clear to me who will pick up this patch. > Can you pick up this patch? As the code isn't in the staging tree, why shouldn't it go through the drivers/gpu/* maintainer? thanks, greg k-h