From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755927AbaICJDX (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Sep 2014 05:03:23 -0400 Received: from cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com ([217.140.96.50]:64057 "EHLO cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752562AbaICJDW (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Sep 2014 05:03:22 -0400 Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2014 10:03:01 +0100 From: Will Deacon To: Brian Norris Cc: Gregory Fong , Matt Porter , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Russell King , Christian Daudt , Mark Rutland , Florian Fainelli , Marc Carino , Kevin Cernekee , Linux Kernel Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: drop ISAR0 workaround for B15 Message-ID: <20140903090301.GA32378@arm.com> References: <1407797053-12544-1-git-send-email-gregory.0xf0@gmail.com> <20140813194047.GA18411@ld-irv-0074> <20140902234924.GZ18411@ld-irv-0074> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140902234924.GZ18411@ld-irv-0074> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 12:49:24AM +0100, Brian Norris wrote: > Ping. > > Is this worthy of 3.17-rc? Or should it just be queued for 3.18, as it's > only removing redundant info? Since it's not actually fixing anything, I don't think it qualifies as a fix. You can still put it into rmk's patch system though, as I don't see this conflicting with anything in the pipeline. Will