From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933021AbaICPmk (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Sep 2014 11:42:40 -0400 Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com ([141.146.126.69]:43374 "EHLO aserp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932868AbaICPmh (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Sep 2014 11:42:37 -0400 Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2014 18:41:30 +0300 From: Dan Carpenter To: Sudip Mukherjee Cc: Benjamin Romer , David Kershner , Greg Kroah-Hartman , devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, sparmaintainer@unisys.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] staging: unisys: uislib: uisqueue.c: rewrite of do_locked_client_insert Message-ID: <20140903154130.GL6549@mwanda> References: <1409681795-23262-1-git-send-email-sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> <20140903084038.GE6600@mwanda> <20140903085944.GA1184@sudip-PC> <20140903144325.GA15176@sudip-PC> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140903144325.GA15176@sudip-PC> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Source-IP: ucsinet21.oracle.com [156.151.31.93] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 08:13:25PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 02:29:44PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 11:40:38AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 11:46:35PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > > > > From: Sudip Mukherjee > > > > > > I really would prefer if you just figured out your email settings so > > > this isn't needed. The From: header is mostly used for people > > > forwarding patches from other people. We have allowed people to use > > > the From header like this if they can't get their corporate email > > > configured properly but I try to discorage it. If everyone starts using > > > From headers like this then it becomes a pain to deal with. > > > > > I will configure the corporate mail. I am the server admin , so there should > > not be any problem in settings. :) > > > v4 of the patch was sent from the corporate mail. The settings were done. > But the problem is coming in a different area. I have given strict DMARC check > for the corporate mail server. DMARC = domain based message authentication. > So the mail i sent reached all the list subscriber from a different server than > our designated server , and as a result it has been marked as spam in many places. > I have already received a few complaints regarding that. > Is there any other way that i send the patch from my personal account , > and use my corporate mail in Signed-off-by ... I guess it's ok by me. It's up to Greg. regards, dan carpenter