From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754193AbaIDQtx (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Sep 2014 12:49:53 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:52854 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750980AbaIDQtv (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Sep 2014 12:49:51 -0400 Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 18:49:48 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Roman Gushchin Cc: mingo@redhat.com, Kirill Tkhai , LKML , Stanislav Fomichev Subject: Re: [RFC] smt-aware rt load balancer Message-ID: <20140904164948.GI346@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <77161409833206@webcorp01h.yandex-team.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <77161409833206@webcorp01h.yandex-team.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22.1 (2013-10-16) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org No, we're not going to merge a second rt balancer. If you want to change it change the one that is there. But it needs to remain a valid _Real_Time_ balancer at all times.