Re: [PATCH] eeepc-laptop: remove disp attribute show function

[Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 11:44:38PM +0200, Frans Klaver wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 11:23:06PM +0200, Frans Klaver wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 02:16:27PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 11:12:42PM +0200, Frans Klaver wrote:
> > > >
> > > >  EEEPC_CREATE_DEVICE_ATTR(camera, 0644, CM_ASL_CAMERA);
> > > >  EEEPC_CREATE_DEVICE_ATTR(cardr, 0644, CM_ASL_CARDREADER);
> > > > -EEEPC_CREATE_DEVICE_ATTR(disp, 0200, CM_ASL_DISPLAYSWITCH);
> > > > +
> > > > +static ssize_t store_disp(struct device *dev,
> > > > +			  struct device_attribute *attr,
> > > > +			  const char *buf, size_t count)
> > > > +{
> > > > +	return store_sys_acpi(dev, CM_ASL_DISPLAYSWITCH, buf, count);
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +static struct device_attribute dev_attr_disp = {
> > > > +	.attr = {
> > > > +		.name = "disp",
> > > > +		.mode = 0200 },
> > > > +	.store  = store_disp,
> > > > +};
> > > 
> > > DEVICE_ATTR()?
> > 
> > That would make sense, wouldn't it? The only defense I have is that it
> > isn't used in EEEPC_CREATE_DEVICE_ATTR() either.
> 
> I might as well fix that as well, and the fact that the octal
> permissions are used instead of S_IRUGO and friends. Would you prefer
> that in a separate patch?

I'm not taking these patches, so I can't answer that...